Top 10 U.S. friendly poker site snubbed by PokersiteScout!!!

[Grim Rapper]

I suggest not using PSS until they list at least the top ten sites in their entirety.

Do we really care about these tiny sites that pay a ransome to be listed? I sure don't.

So a huge site that refuses to pay the piper gets snubbed at a crucial time when Americans need to know their full options!

I have lost all respect for PSS. They have become nothing more than a corporate suckup looking for the good swag!

LIST ALL THE TOP SITES PSS!

[grando]

Post deleted by Ryan Beal

[Pokeraddict]

What network do you think is snubbed?

[Grim Rapper]

What? You own one of those sites they list with 12 people on average playing?

[Sniper]

[ QUOTE ]
What network do you think is snubbed?

[/ QUOTE ]

[Grim Rapper]

[ QUOTE ]
What network do you think is snubbed?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think it, I know they are being snubbed. When I wrote PSS to suggest they consider listing it, they replied they have costs and wouldn't do so unless they got compensated for it.

Now that's fine and dandy, but don't come across to forum readers as the source for accurate numbers on Poker Networks. They are now nothing more than paid affiliates for only listing sites on a pay per view basis.

If it was a small miniscule site, one that didn't rank significantly higher than many already listed, I could see them taking a stand. But this site isn't small and apparently, they refuse to pay PSS to be listed.

Therefore, PSS is flawed info, not accurate, and incomplete.

[Jeffmet3]

whats the name of the site?

[krazyace5]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What network do you think is snubbed?

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Just answer the damn question already.

[Sniper]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What network do you think is snubbed?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think it, I know they are being snubbed. When I wrote PSS to suggest they consider listing it, they replied they have costs and wouldn't do so unless they got compensated for it.

Now that's fine and dandy, but don't come across to forum readers as the source for accurate numbers on Poker Networks. They are now nothing more than paid affiliates for only listing sites on a pay per view basis.

If it was a small miniscule site, one that didn't rank significantly higher than many already listed, I could see them taking a stand. But this site isn't small and apparently, they refuse to pay PSS to be listed.

Therefore, PSS is flawed info, not accurate, and incomplete.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just in case I wasn't clear... What is the name of the network you are talking about?

[Vern]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What network do you think is snubbed?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think it, I know they are being snubbed. When I wrote PSS to suggest they consider listing it, they replied they have costs and wouldn't do so unless they got compensated for it.

Now that's fine and dandy, but don't come across to forum readers as the source for accurate numbers on Poker Networks. They are now nothing more than paid affiliates for only listing sites on a pay per view basis.

If it was a small miniscule site, one that didn't rank significantly higher than many already listed, I could see them taking a stand. But this site isn't small and apparently, they refuse to pay PSS to be listed.

Therefore, PSS is flawed info, not accurate, and incomplete.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just in case I wasn't clear... What is the name of the network you are talking about?

[/ QUOTE ]
The only nice thing is this cannot be some form of back door advertising for you know who cuz they are already listed.