Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-06-2007, 01:49 PM
Mike Kelley Mike Kelley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Reraising
Posts: 2,126
Default Re: Optimal?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The rest of their range is a coinflip against us.

[/ QUOTE ]

And the occasional AJ, AT-

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I thought about those also. I think it's a good play, I hate playing flop poker with SS's
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-06-2007, 01:49 PM
br.bm br.bm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 601
Default Re: Optimal?

I like it
din't look up if it is really right (considering SC numbers) but my gut says yes
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-06-2007, 01:52 PM
PrimogenitoX PrimogenitoX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 732
Default Re: Optimal?

[ QUOTE ]
I think it's a good play, I hate playing flop poker with SS's

[/ QUOTE ]

That's the gist of my shove...avoid continuation bets 2/3 of times when I have no idea what to do..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-06-2007, 01:54 PM
PrimogenitoX PrimogenitoX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 732
Default Re: Optimal?

[ QUOTE ]
Assume they will call with AK, JJ+ thats 3.9% of hands.
Your equity against this range is 35%

I have simplified by giving them both $200.00 and assuming they will never both call.
My rough calculations

92.2% You win Blinds $15.00 = $13.83
2.73% (7.8% x 35%) You are called and win pot $400.00 = $10.92
5.07% (7.8% x 65%) You are called and lose pot -$400.00 = -$20.28

Equity from shove = $4.47.
Pretty close, +EV but high variance.
If they play predictably then a 3bb raise should steal their blinds a lot of the time and you can get away from a re-raise easy enough.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you for putting the time into doing this; but I think you assign them too tight a range. I didn't really have reads on them, but you can't assume they are perfect competent shortstackers. I think a wider range like 88+, AQ+ with some random hands like 5% of the time is in order.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-06-2007, 01:59 PM
Sounded Simple Sounded Simple is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Options... Add More Chips
Posts: 407
Default Re: Optimal?

I just used the range Alex suggested when he didnt like the play - kind of a worst case scenario.
My guess is that there is no range that we dont profit against.

As Mike points out if we widen their range then we probably are adding hands like flipping PPs or favorites against AJ/KQ so thats even better.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-06-2007, 02:01 PM
Renton Renton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: Optimal?

yeah i think you should just raise

its not like you are wanting to maximise FE here, AQ is a strong hand.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-06-2007, 02:13 PM
Kos13 Kos13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Purdue
Posts: 2,118
Default Re: Optimal?

[ QUOTE ]
its not like you are wanting to maximise FE here, AQ is a strong hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know...against tight shortstackers, AQ is never the best hand when they call, so increasing FE seems like a good thing. For example, they may 3bet shove with 88 to a simple button steal, but this might get them to fold 88/99/AQ, which is a good thing. Of course, this assumes that these guys would fold AJ to a simple button steal, and that might not be true.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-06-2007, 03:44 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: Optimal?

man, i don't think this is the best line assuming they're compotent. Raise it up to $30. Also, unless the big stacks are huge fish I would probably just leave the game since you have a really [censored] seat at the table. At least get up and move to whatever open seat there is at the table.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-06-2007, 04:11 PM
Sounded Simple Sounded Simple is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Options... Add More Chips
Posts: 407
Default Re: Optimal?

I always thought it was OK to be to the right of a Short Stack since you can steal his blinds (unless they adjust and start re-stealing correctly)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:21 PM
Johnes Benjamin Johnes Benjamin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 3rd & Delaware
Posts: 848
Default Re: Optimal?

[ QUOTE ]
I always thought it was OK to be to the right of a Short Stack since you can steal his blinds (unless they adjust and start re-stealing correctly)

[/ QUOTE ]

I love being on the right of nitty shortstackers. Stealing their blinds almost pays for me to sit at the table and they will still stack off lighter than a full stack would.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.