#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
You are correct that if you get to see a flop, QJ is much better than 7-2 , but what people are trying to say is that it's very unlikely you will even get to SEE the flop...
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
If I don't see a flop it is because a guy has a better hand than mine and I feel well with it. It is not because everybody think I am wrong that I am wrong...
if we keep with the AJ+ 99+ it is only 5.5 % range. It itsn't so clear. If I raise allin, I can't fold preflop ( what a surprise ) And I will see a flop a small % of the time. All is very clear for me. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
[ QUOTE ]
I think it was pretty clear. Since I can fold even when I hit with 7 2o but I don't fold if I hit ( a J or a Q ), I didn't turned QJs into 72o [/ QUOTE ] ryen what you are suggesting in this thread is nothing new. certainly raising to 300 is an alternative, but it is just an alternative and usually folding here is your best action. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
[ QUOTE ]
ryen what you are suggesting in this thread is nothing new. certainly raising to 300 is an alternative, but it is just an alternative and usually folding here is your best action. [/ QUOTE ] Well I agree with you. If I posted this hand it is because I thought this raise was funny. I started to be upset when everybody answered there wasnt anything to think and that it was stupid from my part. The ton was very arrogant, and so, since there was nobody to defend another point of view, I started to defend it. Moreover, the guy who played this hand plays many other types of hand very strangely. Everybody would say it is leak ... Well it is not so clear guys, really ! I was shocked by the ton in this thread ... |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
I really think, raising is a very sophisticated play, since every player behind you "must understand that you got QQ+ and want value". It requires a lot of multiple level-thinking, so IŽd only do that on a 125$+ higher buyin, where people make notes. Make sure you did that a few times before with AA etc. So raising is maybe 0,1% of the time a play to mix it up.
I can`t see this hand as an insta-muck, because we only have to worry very much about the bigstack, which is also in a pretty early position and has to tighten his calling-range. This said, i still think about it as a kind of "ICM-bluff"(because the default ICM play should be a fold). IMO its only worth to do it in a higher buy-in (60+), since people actually give you more credit for an UTG push than in a 10$, where only few actually know what position is [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
My guess is that this is probably a marginally profitable play. The stacks are beautifully situated for a steal from UTG == almost perfect. No shorties, no big stacks in the blinds, everybody kind of marginal.
Also, QJs is a good hand to be doing this with, in case somebody calls you and you have to play a flop. If the flop doesn't hit or give you a draw, then you can safely fold knowing you are behind (unless it's the BB who called you, in which case I'm pushing any flop he checks to me). With a hand like 22 or 33, I would prefer a push to a raise, as almost every flop will look ugly to you. Regardless of your opponent's level of expertise, a 3xbb raise from UTG with 11bbs looks HUGE to them. Especially if you have been reasonably tight. Nobody is going to want to play back at you unless they have a very good hand. I estimate that you need to steal the blinds 67% of the time for this to be break-even, since you are raising 300 chips to steal 150 chips. In order to steal the blinds 67% of the time, your opponent's calling/pushing range needs to be 88+,AJs+,AQo+. If the table has been reasonably tight and you have been reasonably tight, I'll bet that you can do better than that. For example, I would expect that the CO's and MP1's pushing range to be quite a bit tighter than that. With 1100 chips and the blinds 100/50 and the blinds about to hit me again, I am willing to make a high-variance play, if I think there's a decent chance that the play is +EV. I would say that this play qualifies. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
Easy fold, this is why the 55s are profitable. The regulars all suck, but unfortunately they keep sucking out on me
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
OP,
sometimes in STTF we don't take the time to explain our reasonings behind hands we generally agree on to be standard. you've gotten a little bit of that in this thread, and so I will explain a little bit to you here. you have 1,100 if you raise to t300 and someone shoves over you (assumedly they have you covered) now we have to call 800 into 300+300+800 = 1400 pot. now at this point we'd be correct to fold against that 99+,AJs+ range as earlier stated. (getting 1.4:1 as a 2;1 dog) so our plan here is raise 28% of our stack fold if someone pushes over check/fold flop if cold-called and we whiff (i think that was your flop plan it sounded like?) sure, sometimes in exchange for this seemingly rather large risk we will add the blinds to our stack. (about 14% worth) on rarer occassion, we'll win more when the following happens: a) they only cold-call b) we flop "big" c) they don't flop as big d) our hand holds if we do end up w/a showdown seems like we're risking a lot for not that much return as far as limping, I guess I *MIGHT* consider it if it has been an unusually tight table or an unusually loose/passive table. Thats rare...and even then I'm pretty sure its still a leak in the long run - but not as horrible a leak as it would be without either of those two extreme circumstances. as far as shoving? QJs = not the nutz 11 BBs = healthy so those are a few of the reasons why I would simply ditch this hand preflop and why I wouldn't really raise or limp that much if ever. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
A very nice, rational, well thought out post. And I like the calm and professional manner it was presented. Very nice.
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 55$ QJ sorted UTG. blinds 50/100
Ryendal,
Is this a regular or a turbo. Even if a good regular made that play it doesn't make it right. I consider myself to be the best regular at the $60's (ZOMG GAUNTLET IS THROWN DOWN) and I make mistakes or stupid plays why is it so unbelievable to think this regular wasn't paying attention. |
|
|