|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
Nothing inconsistent at all with what I said. I never said the Rainbows would go winless in the Pac10. It's pretty obvious though that if they played in any of the major conferences they'd be lucky to be .500.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Nothing inconsistent at all with what I said. I never said the Rainbows would go winless in the Pac10. It's pretty obvious though that if they played in any of the major conferences they'd be lucky to be .500. [/ QUOTE ] I think they'd do well in the ACC, Big Ten, and Big East. Undefeated? NO. .500? No. somewhere in between. This is a solid team. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Nothing inconsistent at all with what I said. I never said the Rainbows would go winless in the Pac10. It's pretty obvious though that if they played in any of the major conferences they'd be lucky to be .500. [/ QUOTE ] I think they'd do well in the ACC, Big Ten, and Big East. Undefeated? NO. .500? No. somewhere in between. This is a solid team. [/ QUOTE ] They would be .500 or less in the Pac10, SEC, BigXII, and Big11Ten for sure |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Nothing inconsistent at all with what I said. I never said the Rainbows would go winless in the Pac10. It's pretty obvious though that if they played in any of the major conferences they'd be lucky to be .500. [/ QUOTE ] I think they'd do well in the ACC, Big Ten, and Big East. Undefeated? NO. .500? No. somewhere in between. This is a solid team. [/ QUOTE ] They would be .500 or less in the Pac10, SEC, BigXII, and Big11Ten for sure [/ QUOTE ] In the Big 12? Depending on their schedule and if in North or South, I think they can beat Baylor, Iowa State, Nebraska, Kansas State (who Fresno St. beat), Colorado, etc. I think they go over .500 in there. They may play Kansas, so well shall see.. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Nothing inconsistent at all with what I said. I never said the Rainbows would go winless in the Pac10. It's pretty obvious though that if they played in any of the major conferences they'd be lucky to be .500. [/ QUOTE ] You've been inconsistent enough just in your comments about this game. They've beaten everybody who had the balls to face them. You'll never know how well they'd do because the mainland teams keep ducking Hawaii. They don't want to get embarrassed, plain and simple. By the way, they're the Warriors. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
[ QUOTE ]
They've beaten everybody who had the balls to face them [/ QUOTE ] bwahahahahahahaha Rainbows4evah! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] They've beaten everybody who had the balls to face them [/ QUOTE ] bwahahahahahahaha Rainbows4evah! [/ QUOTE ] What's funny? Its true. Simple fact is, Michigan was on their schedule, then UM backed out and replaced them with App State. Enough said. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] They've beaten everybody who had the balls to face them [/ QUOTE ] bwahahahahahahaha Rainbows4evah! [/ QUOTE ] What's funny? Its true. Simple fact is, Michigan was on their schedule, then UM backed out and replaced them with App State. Enough said. [/ QUOTE ] but it is hawai'i's fault that the other teams backed out they've created a hostile and dangerous environment for other teams |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Washington exposes Hawai\'i the Fraud Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Nothing inconsistent at all with what I said. I never said the Rainbows would go winless in the Pac10. It's pretty obvious though that if they played in any of the major conferences they'd be lucky to be .500. [/ QUOTE ] Clark, come on. You're being dishonest and you know it. Yes technically you didn't contradict yourself. But before the game you brought up positive points about the Huskies and said that you thought they would win. After the game you bring up negative points about the Huskies to downgrade Hawaii's win. While both the positive and negative points may not contradict each other(and both may be true) its clear that you have an agenda. Why exactly do you hate Hawaii so much? |
|
|