Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-23-2007, 01:01 PM
twonine29 twonine29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 176
Default Were Poker Tournaments always crapshoots at the end?

Before the "poker boom", what were final tables like at major poker events? Were there a lot of big "all-in" preflops, or was there more play with the cards down?

If it was different, what causes the difference, higher blinds compared to stacks, or just a general willingness to re-raise lighter/more often preflop and get the money in?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-23-2007, 01:46 PM
Bonified Bonified is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slave to the grind
Posts: 471
Default Re: Were Poker Tournaments always crapshoots at the end?

It depended on the tournament, but a lot of the time, no, they weren't anywhere near as fast. For both the reasons that you state, plus another big reason is that the fields were much smaller.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2007, 01:50 PM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: Were Poker Tournaments always crapshoots at the end?

Pre-internet there weren't jam and fold tables. No "Kill Phil". Ppl didn't know how to play a short stack.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-23-2007, 03:31 PM
FortWorthJim FortWorthJim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 88
Default Re: Were Poker Tournaments always crapshoots at the end?

Blair Rodman's blog has been down for a while, but in one of the old entries he talked about old-time players having a hard time adjusting to how willing the new breed of players is to get their money in with "medium strength" (his quote) hands like TT, JJ, AK.

He used for example the hand at, I believe, a Bellagio tournament last year when Joe Pelton raised with J8h, and Nick Schulman reraised with JJ.

They were both in the top 10 in chips in the tournament with fewer than 100 players left. Joe moved in, but Rodman was most surprised that Nick snap-called with no hesitation.

Rodman said players 10-15 years ago would never get all their money in with JJ against another chip leader.

Pre-flop play is so much more aggressive now that players have to counter with equal aggression, including, in the words of game-theory expert Vanessa Rousso, making "aggressive calls" for all the money preflop with less than AA or KK.

I don't know anything about the play in the old tournaments, but that is probably a prime reason why Ungar was able to dominate so much. And Hellmuth and Huck Seed, when he first came on the scene, were also very successful playing a lot of hands and making a lot of preflop raises.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-23-2007, 05:18 PM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: Were Poker Tournaments always crapshoots at the end?

The WPT rules were changed to make the final table structure faster. This was probably done so they can show a higher percentage of the hands on TV and don't have to film as long. The WSOP side events this year also have shallow money final tables. Both of these changes have been very controversial.

Major tournaments in the past did not have large fields, and often were played with deep money similar to cash games. This is often true in WPT events now, except when you get to the final six.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2007, 06:09 PM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: Were Poker Tournaments always crapshoots at the end?

The whole concept of fold equity sorta went out the window in the last few years.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-24-2007, 08:59 AM
gobboboy gobboboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Missing wraps.
Posts: 4,836
Default Re: Were Poker Tournaments always crapshoots at the end?

[ QUOTE ]
The whole concept of fold equity sorta went out the window in the last few years.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2007, 02:06 PM
Supwithbates Supwithbates is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,606
Default Re: Were Poker Tournaments always crapshoots at the end?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The whole concept of fold equity sorta went out the window in the last few years.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's it.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's why gobbo is so dominant. He's one of the few players that still has fold equity.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.