|
|
#61
04-01-2007, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.spitflames.com/Damme.gif [/ QUOTE ] I dig this and all, but I guess I don't really see the relevance of Breakin' to our situation. 
|
|
#62
04-01-2007, 01:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
[ QUOTE ]
Acting on this simple attraction makes you a pedo, however. This is because kids are dumb. I mean this could apply to 18 yr old girls too, because theyre pretty dumb, but you gotta set the cutoff point somewhere. 14 year olds really just don't know how to handle their emotions and sex at that age, particularly with an adult, can have life-long traumatic results. [/ QUOTE ] That's not very logical... You argue "You can't have sex with kids because they are dumb". With the same logic you can't have sex with an adult whose IQ is 80. Some adults can't handle their emotions either, should they be denied sex by law?
|
|
#64
04-01-2007, 01:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] http://www.spitflames.com/Damme.gif [/ QUOTE ] I dig this and all, but I guess I don't really see the relevance of Breakin' to our situation. [/ QUOTE ] btw what is this from?
|
|
#65
04-01-2007, 02:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] http://www.spitflames.com/Damme.gif [/ QUOTE ] I dig this and all, but I guess I don't really see the relevance of Breakin' to our situation. [/ QUOTE ] btw what is this from? [/ QUOTE ] Uh... from Breakin'?
|
|
#66
04-01-2007, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
[ QUOTE ]
I dig this and all, but I guess I don't really see the relevance of Breakin' to our situation. [/ QUOTE ] WWJ-CVDD?
|
|
#67
04-01-2007, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] My disagreement was with banks2334's claim that early teenagers (by and large) are inherently not able to have sexual relationships without it opening a pandora's box of emotional issues. (Not so much with what you're saying) I think that a lot of difficulties teens have with sex are rooted in their social conditioning and environments; not their biology. For example, high school relationships have probably the most drama you'll ever witness in your life. People are quick to say that this is because they're young and therefore immature. But high schoolers are also in a very different environment than adults. They are required to co-exist in the same place for four years, seeing the same people every day for hours on end. Their peer group (from whom it is expected that they will make friends and romantic partners) is completely centralized. This means that when you break up with girl in your English class, you still have to interact with her every single day. If adults had to exist in that kind of situation, there would be a lot more unnecessary, immature drama in everyone's life. [/ QUOTE ] You mean like how they exist with each other at work? Which, btw...usually lasts alot longer than 4 years. This reasoning for your argument is pretty lame. b [/ QUOTE ] I would bet 90+% of high school couples go to the same school and see each other every day. I would bet <10% of adult couples work together and therefore are not forced to see each other every day. Your reasoning for your argument is pretty lame. [/ QUOTE ] Read the whole post I quoted. They become couples in highschool alot of the time. People become couples in work environments(and college, yet college usually doesn't play out like highschool.) alot of the time also. Not to mention, they are around their 'peer' (work)group most of the time that leads to alot of centralization. It's a linnear argument. Drama-wise, it'd look like this HS>>>college>>>work. Which is also linnear to maturity level. b
|
|
#68
04-01-2007, 09:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
[ QUOTE ]
How many goddamn times has OOT done this thread? It's not one of the few topics that gets funnier or more interesting by repetition. But, so as not to deny the validity of the subject, I will opine: sexual impulse is not a choice, and thus not a moral quantity. Acting on sexual impulse is a choice, and thus may be "right" or "wrong", depending on the age cutoffs set by our august lawmakers. [/ QUOTE ] I didn't read everything after this post so I may have missed a follow-up. But here's my question, what about something like masturbating to a picture (lets say non-pornographic to avoid an aspect that is clearly exploitative) 14 year old you're sexually attracted to. I'm just wondering where that fits into your moral quantity vs. choice theory (which is I agree with, I just think is slightly simplistic).
|
|
#69
04-01-2007, 10:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
|
|
#70
04-02-2007, 07:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexual Double Standards (female input would be greatly appreciated
Some of you guys have a very strange opinion of what is pedophilia. Since OP stressed that these were girls that had gone through puberty and developed female forms. Doesn't mean it's ok for a 25 year old to bone them, but it wouldn't make him a pedophile. Just someone who is taking advantage of someone who isn't emotionally mature.
Pedophiles are sexually attracted to children, and wouldn't have any interest in someone who had gone through puberty.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
