|
|
#1
05-10-2007, 03:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
NL100 folding set to represented flush?
Are you ever folding this here? I am not sure, villain seems pretty donkish 44/7/2 over 70 hands but I havent played andy hands with him yet.
OnGame's Room No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (5 handed) by Hand Converter CG saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font> Button ($98.50) SB ($47.50) BB ($66.95) UTG ($175.80) Hero ($109.10) Preflop: Hero is MP with 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. UTG folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $3.5</font>, Button folds, SB folds, BB calls $2.50. Flop: ($7.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $5.5</font>, BB calls $5.50. Turn: ($18.50) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $12</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $24</font>, Hero calls $12. River: ($66.50) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">BB bets $33.95 (All-In)</font>, Hero folds. Final Pot: $100.45 
|
|
#2
05-10-2007, 03:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?
44/7 makes this a lot tougher.
Then again that could mean he would do this with 45 also.... If he has shown down some wierd crap I would call here and see a lot of 2pair but if he hasnt shown down anything odd I guess you just have to fold. FWIW I push turn.
|
|
#5
05-10-2007, 04:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?
I'd shove turn.
|
|
#7
05-10-2007, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?
[ QUOTE ]
can you reason the shove? is it just villains stacksize? I most likely made a bad fold and actually I also never fold sets anywhere near a 3flush board. [/ QUOTE ] Stack size yes. If your plan is to check/fold river on a non-paired board (bad plan) it's better to shove the turn and get some fold equity against non-diamond hands. If he calls you have outs even if he has a flush. In retrospect if you're playing the hand like that you should have folded to the minraise on the turn...
|
|
#8
05-10-2007, 04:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] can you reason the shove? is it just villains stacksize? I most likely made a bad fold and actually I also never fold sets anywhere near a 3flush board. [/ QUOTE ] Stack size yes. If your plan is to check/fold river on a non-paired board (bad plan) it's better to shove the turn and get some fold equity against non-diamond hands. If he calls you have outs even if he has a flush. In retrospect if you're playing the hand like that you should have folded to the minraise on the turn... [/ QUOTE ] we're in position, we can't check-fold the river. why do we want any fe? why should we fold to the miniraise on the turn when we have direct odds to call?
|
|
#9
05-10-2007, 04:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?
why does everyone like a shove on the river? 2 of the 3 draws just got there. sure he might be over-playing the two pair, but if he has a two pair than he's probably just checking the river right?
I like the way the hand was played. The river is close but whatever.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
