KJo at a maniac table.

[l0gician]

[ QUOTE ]

Since villain is very aggro, you might want 2 bets to go in. Betting allows villain to slow down, realizing that you do have something and just call. Or it allows him to own you for value when he does have the best hand and raise. So you should check/raise because he's betting 100%. The only positive outcome from leading the turn is if he goes for the FU-raise with a 2-5 outer, but that doesn't happen often enough to make it a viable play imo.

The big problem with a check/raise is that it allows him to 3-bet. Given all the action in this hand, your equity is probably down the shitter if he does that.

You should always go to showdown vs this guy. But you need a much bigger equity to raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

I get most of what you are saying but not the c/r part. Since he bets 100% and I was getting owned by donking the turn, how is a c/r different/better? Or are you saying if I really have the best hand than a c/r is preferred, but in this case c/c because I have little equity and donking turn is just getting value owned? and that if I did have the best hand c/r gets more bets in so is preferred to donking?