#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
I fold. [/ QUOTE ] I am schocked to see u say that. Isn't shoving +ev? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
I fold. [/ QUOTE ] I agree and I appreciate you posting here more lately Curtains. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
def fold.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
I hate these situations too. For people saying fold how high would the pair have to be for us to shove? What about raise?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges?
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
66 def raise, ehh 55 prob raise, 44 prob fold.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges? [/ QUOTE ] i havn't done any calcs or anything so i dunno if it's unexploitable, but it doesn't need to be unexploitable to be +ev. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
66 def raise, ehh 55 prob raise, 44 prob fold. [/ QUOTE ] open folding 44 here is absurdly weak tight |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
Fold. And I disagree with you, djk, folding 44 here is fine too. Raising it is straight up bad and open shoving, though marginally +EV, is ridiculously high variance and something we should avoid. It's taken me a looooong time to realize this.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
damn i did that wrong
|
|
|