|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200 NL - Some Hands
[ QUOTE ]
do you think a check on the river with an offsuit 2 would induce a bluff? or a bet by a weaker ace? and even if you c/raise...a bluff obviously won't call, and a weaker ace might not as well. As played, you can get a weak ace A10/aj/aQ to make a crying call? correct? i dont know if you'd get more value by checkraising the river there. [/ QUOTE ] Good players are valuebetting AQ/AJ/AT 100% on a blank (2o) river. They should also be betting any random floats or unimproved weak type hands when I check to them after raising pf, cbetting A-hi flop, and shutting down. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200 NL - Some Hands
1. shove
2. call 3. I would probably either fire 3 streets or go for the c/r on the river also. I assume you missed one on the turn right? edit: ok, I see that you did miss a c/r. Thats fine. Are we not c/r the river because we think AJ is a big part of his range or because he isn't going to bet hands worse than AQ because you're calling with Ax and chopping a lot of the time? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200 NL - Some Hands
[ QUOTE ]
1. shove 2. call 3. I would probably either fire 3 streets or go for the c/r on the river also. I assume you missed one on the turn right? edit: ok, I see that you did miss a c/r. Thats fine. Are we not c/r the river because we think AJ is a big part of his range or because he isn't going to bet hands worse than AQ because you're calling with Ax and chopping a lot of the time? [/ QUOTE ] The J is a bad rivercard to c/r because the c/r becomes ineffective since it won't work against hands like AQ anymore [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200 NL - Some Hands
1.shove
2.call is good, call reasonable river bet 3.played well |
|
|