|
|
#11
10-16-2007, 03:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 6)
Chambers just got traded to the Chargers
|
|
#12
10-16-2007, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 6)
[ QUOTE ]
Chambers just got traded to the Chargers [/ QUOTE ] Does this make the Chargers better or does it crowd an already underused receiving core? Chambers did look lost since Cleo Lemon took over. He has been a boom or bust guy the past few years. If you involve him early he is good, but forget about him and he doesn't get open the rest of the game.
|
|
#13
10-16-2007, 05:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 6)
i don't think there are any players in the nfl you could add to your team for "free" and they would make your team worse, so adding chambers can't hurt.
please no tangents regarding morale, chemistry, etc.
|
|
#14
10-16-2007, 07:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 6)
Zero offence intended OP but I'd expect this thread to receive declining interest as the season goes.
I don't remember a season like this since '94 when it was 49ers, Cowboys, everyone else. I'd almost have a hard time getting excited about a wildcard spot if my team was in the hunt.
|
|
#15
10-16-2007, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 6)
[ QUOTE ]
Zero offence intended OP but I'd expect this thread to receive declining interest as the season goes. I don't remember a season like this since '94 when it was 49ers, Cowboys, everyone else. I'd almost have a hard time getting excited about a wildcard spot if my team was in the hunt. [/ QUOTE ] upsets happen. iirc, the Steelers were 10 point dogs when they won @ Indy in the 2005 playoffs. my guess is that it would be less than that right now.
|
|
#16
10-16-2007, 08:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 6)
[ QUOTE ]
NE Indy Pitt Chargers Jax Tenn Baltimore Houston Cleveland KC Denver Cinci Oakland NYG Miami [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] I agree with your ranking of the NY Gets. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#19
10-17-2007, 02:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 6)
Holy [censored], those Fox rankings are retarded.
And I think Cleveland should keep playing Anderson as long as they have a reasonable shot at the playoffs.
|
|
#20
10-17-2007, 03:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 6)
The Colts are undefeated, and have a much better team than they did last year, when they won the Super Bowl. They have a much better defense than they did last year, especially against the run, adding Freddy Keaiho, a healthy bob sanders, and Kelvin Hayden instead of Jason David (who's gotten abused).
According to DVOA, they were 7th in the league in rushing last year. This year, they are first in the league in rushing, and no one is close. The Fox rankings at least have #1 right.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
