#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
wow i'm really surprised people think this is a bluff, i think it's a value bet and perfectly fine
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
wow i'm really surprised people think this is a bluff, i think it's a value bet and perfectly fine [/ QUOTE ] Particularly against this villain. He enjoys calling. I'd prefer 3-betting pf, but I like the way you played this hand. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
Not gonna speak for bobbo but when I view this hand, I see minimal value in a river bet. Your bet will signify minimal FE he may think he has thus thwarting his bluffing frequency. This also now narrows his calling/raising range weight to hands that beat you. I think the bluff aspect is not precisely QQ but also weaker K's....thus the bad bluff if that was his/your intentions.
I understand he checks behind with weaker hands sometimes but I just look at it as the value I give up by having the best hand get checked through on the river << then the times I stack off with JJ on this board or at the very least $755. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
jloc i'm really confused by your post.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
Cliff notes to slightly buzzed post - This bet (taking into consideration stack sizes and lines taken) shows a ton of strength imo. This lowers the times he will bluff raise or even call with weaker. Conversely, this creates a heavily weighted range for him that does beat you if he calls/raises. The amount it costs you to try and gain value does not outway the times it costs you $755-your stack when he does infact have you beat.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
I'M SO CONFUSED
I SITLL LIKE THIS VALUE BET |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
after the turn he has $650 left. when i bet $755 on the river i am "putting him all-in".
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
after the turn he has $650 left. when i bet $755 on the river i am "putting him all-in". [/ QUOTE ] THE ALL IN IS THE MOST POWERFUL MOVE IN POKER, IT PUTS YOUR OPPONENT AT A DECISION FOR ALL OF HIS CHIPS |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
You
don't get called by worse often enough to justify the losses you take by going 'for value'... To answer post title...yes, I believe it's too thin. BUT if I did decide to go for some thin value, c/c'ng river seems just as viable. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
wow i'm really surprised people think this is a bluff, i think it's a value bet and perfectly fine [/ QUOTE ] what hand range do you expect this type of player to call with then? (not saying this is a bad line, just curious what you think his range is) |
|
|