Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 09-07-2007, 01:16 PM
pirateboy pirateboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,514
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

The total for Southern Miss/Tenn dropped to 47.5 from 50. Any USM fans have any news? Nothing happened to my Vols this week. I added a unit on the new total.
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 09-07-2007, 01:17 PM
New001 New001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gogogogo, Madagascar
Posts: 6,914
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

I'm against you on that one with OSU -23.
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 09-07-2007, 01:21 PM
jhennis jhennis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 136
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

Rutgers -16
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 09-07-2007, 01:34 PM
sanmarcosrun1 sanmarcosrun1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 741
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

Well after last nights disaster I went 1-2 and one of loses was 2unit play.
Brings my season record to 27-9 and dropping my total season units won to +10.282

Tonight have Rutgers at -17 sadly got it night before it dropped back down to -15.5 due to my lack of inexperience and poor research not knowing about Dr. bob affecting lines. Live an learn. Waiting on total on game to see if it moves anymore at all as it stands now -49 and I am liking the under there.
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 09-07-2007, 02:14 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

[ QUOTE ]
I think he is on Navy, Va. Tech, Tulane, Oregon, and South Carolina. These are not for sure, just an educated guess based on the line moves.

I heard he is on Cincy, but that line has not budged at The Greek.

[/ QUOTE ]

He was on Cinci.

He is also on the ECU/UNC game. Is he on UNC - is that why it went from -5 to -4.5?
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 09-07-2007, 02:20 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The cat is back by popular demand.
Posts: 29,344
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

I'm leaning UNC myself.
But I'm no Dr. Bob. I'm just MicroBob.
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 09-07-2007, 06:53 PM
Ichabod1985 Ichabod1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 830
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

Rutgers/Navy Under 50 1 Unit
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 09-07-2007, 08:43 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

Rutgers -5.5 v Navy 2nd Half bet 1.1u to win 1u
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 09-07-2007, 09:42 PM
BobJoeJim BobJoeJim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 1,450
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

[ QUOTE ]
The Oregon State game was the epitome of fluky - I wouldn't worry about that one. Of course the final makes it look one-sided, but things just have a tendency to snowball that way.

Oregon State outgained them 310-229. Cincy could have just punted on 1st down every time they had the ball except when they took over in FG range and won easily.

All-American kicker missed a chip shot, Cincy true freshman makes 55-yarder...

And the Oregon State punting (done by the kicker as a fill-in)...yikes.

Muffed fair catch near the goal line should have been kick catch interference.

Etc.

[/ QUOTE ]
It's fluky that they lost by 30 but not that they didn't cover. OSU's quarterbacks are atrocious, and the offensive line is mediocre at best. Bernard is a great back, but with 8 men in the box and no holes to run through he can't do it ALL himself (okay, he was able to against Utah, but he can't do it consistently). Defensively the OSU front seven is great and will get a lot of sacks and TFLs, but the secondary is highly vulnerable, and any team that can throw the ball will *eventually* get their QB time to throw and have their share of big plays. At punter Serna may be a "fill in", but he's all they have and he's gonna keep punting. I've watched both of their games so far, and having him punt does not bode well for them.

Right now, from everything I've seen this year, I have to say that betting against any team from the state of Oregon seems highly EV to me. The Beavs have been HIGHLY unimpressive in two straight games (remember, they were tied 7-7 with Utah and getting outplayed until they injured the QB. 24-7 was not representative of what happened in that game). As for my concerns about Oregon, those I've already posted.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.