|
|
#11
11-30-2006, 03:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQs - 449 - 3 opponents
[ QUOTE ]
I did check the river and it got checked through. Villains turned out to be über passive. UTG held 2 pairs and UTG2 had a set! [/ QUOTE ] UTG+2 actually played pretty well. Slowplaying this far will make it easier for him to collect extra bets on sixth street. 
|
|
#12
12-01-2006, 02:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AQs - 449 - 3 opponents
I do not bet the river here. Against one player, I might. But with two, one of them has you beat. If they paid off when the K landed on the turn, they will call the river. I would check/fold.
|
|
#13
12-01-2006, 05:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AQs - 449 - 3 opponents
Is it wrong that I want to check/fold the turn against these two villains, especially out of position?
As played, I'd definitely check/fold the river.
|
|
#14
12-01-2006, 07:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AQs - 449 - 3 opponents
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 4 players to the flop and you wiffing on it I'm checking this out of position more than I'm c-betting it. When the K hits the turn on the turn I'd bet with that being the last money I put in the put UI. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. I wouldn't c-bet this flop OOP either. [/ QUOTE ] paired board helps us a bit here.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
