Weird PLO river spot w/ two pair + naked ace. - Page 2

RichC. · #11 08-01-2007, 03:53 PM

bluff shoving seems bad to me. he never folds a baby flush or a straight here often enough i think. in fact, every option you have sucks hard here, folding is ugly, and calling sucks, and bluff shoving is a spew. i think i just call and hope to pick off his bluff (i know it sucks, but i just hate a river shove here).

s33w33d · #12 08-01-2007, 04:09 PM

I shove and puke simultaneously.

adanthar · #13 08-01-2007, 05:16 PM

all options seem pretty equally bad but I probably at least don't fold because I'm a fish.

banthis! · #14 08-01-2007, 05:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I shove and puke simultaneously.

[/ QUOTE ]

nath · #15 08-01-2007, 05:43 PM

whatever, he bet 1/6 pot on the river, it's an obvious blocking bet, he always folds to your shove, and you have the key card

Exitonly · #16 08-01-2007, 05:48 PM

If by always folds to your shove, you mean always calls with any flush/sometimes straight.

nath · #17 08-01-2007, 06:05 PM

look, people make obvious blocking bets because they suck they want a cheap showdown. so you deny that to them. they fold often. even in omaha.

Yuv · #18 08-01-2007, 06:13 PM

He'll tank, call and scream I KNEW IT!!!!!!!!!.

(Yet I still shove, since it's online, so it's not real money)

Bakes · #19 08-01-2007, 06:18 PM

if he was afraid of a nut flush here he would check call. as it stand he has a flush (maaaybe a straight), doesn't put you on one, and is gonna snap call your raise imo.

dogsballs · #20 08-01-2007, 07:06 PM

I'm more thinking he is actually more likely to be just on the straight/possible set. Unless he's an idiot he must have a set/straight draw on teh flop; calling down just for a crappy flush seems unlikely. But if he had a flush draw also, wouldnt he play hard vs a button bet on teh flop...? Could be reading too far into the whole thing but I like the shove even better right now.