#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: microposter hand D (#12122766443): J9o
[ QUOTE ]
First The pot is 5 SB's if you call. Its not a disaster to keep UTG in the pot. Except from KQ, Q9 and 98 there are no hands he can have where he have odds to call 1 bet but not 2 bets. [/ QUOTE ] This is not true... while unlikely, villian could have AQ or AK, both of which have odds to call one bet, but not 2 bets. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: microposter hand D (#12122766443): J9o
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] First The pot is 5 SB's if you call. Its not a disaster to keep UTG in the pot. Except from KQ, Q9 and 98 there are no hands he can have where he have odds to call 1 bet but not 2 bets. [/ QUOTE ] This is not true... while unlikely, villian could have AQ or AK, both of which have odds to call one bet, but not 2 bets. [/ QUOTE ] Ya you would want to fold those and I prolly underestimate how often an unknown at these stakes has those hands. That said he will be getting 5:1 with 10 outs so it wouldnt wouldnt be a "disaster" if he had those hands and called 1 bet K9 is another hand you wouldnt hate folding out btw. But all these hands are such a small part of his range, so again; the need to protect our hand is practically non existing. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: microposter hand D (#12122766443): J9o
In principle, if the pot is small, our equity from an extra call may be bigger than Villans equity of the pot in witch case it would be a mistake to protect even if ahead. Not sure how often that applies though.
|
|
|