|
|
|
|
#1
10-31-2007, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
In a lot of places a raise is possible if the previous raise was >= 1/2 of the first raise. Here russian raises 63 to 198 which is >= (125/2 = 62.5), and hence a raise should be allowed under these rules. Most dealers I've encountered cannot add/divide properly. But again, some places don't follow this 1/2 rule.
|
|
#2
10-31-2007, 05:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
I realize its more fun to think that the raise is $63 because it is just over half of $125 (which is also the wrong number to look at because you have to subtract the $2 big blind to get the net raise). But the raise was actually $73.
Carry on.
|
|
#3
10-31-2007, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
[ QUOTE ]
I realize its more fun to think that the raise is $63 because it is just over half of $125 (which is also the wrong number to look at because you have to subtract the $2 big blind to get the net raise). But the raise was actually $73. Carry on. [/ QUOTE ] Big blind is 5 not 2 not sure how thats relevant. But you are right i do retard math in the morning.
|
|
#4
10-31-2007, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
[ QUOTE ]
I realize its more fun to think that the raise is $63 because it is just over half of $125 (which is also the wrong number to look at because you have to subtract the $2 big blind to get the net raise). But the raise was actually $73. Carry on. [/ QUOTE ] This action wasn't pre-flop. The level of the blinds are irrelevant.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
