|
|
#31
09-15-2007, 12:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dunk Tank Time! Who Wants To Ban Me?
[ QUOTE ]
Borodog dropped this doozy a few weeks ago. It inspired an avatar by elwoodblues that I'm still giggling at. [/ QUOTE ] Given that borodog's doozies converted me to anarchocapitalism, I don't think he's likely to get the title of worst political argument of the month from me. (Not to say that he's out of the running to getting me banned, he just has to think of a more creative way to do it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ) 
|
|
#32
09-16-2007, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dunk Tank Time! Who Wants To Ban Me?
The winner is The Once And Future King, for arguing against the human action axiom by claiming that people don't exist. Well done TOAFK, you got me banned.
Iron, lock me up till October.
|
|
#33
09-16-2007, 10:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dunk Tank Time! Who Wants To Ban Me?
[ QUOTE ]
Borodog dropped this doozy a few weeks ago. It inspired an avatar by elwoodblues that I'm still giggling at. [/ QUOTE ] You suck at this game. I wasn't making an argument. Merely stating an opinion. In my new magnanimosity, I would let this slide, if it weren't for the fact that this was already pointed out in a post that you then deleted.
|
|
#35
09-17-2007, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dunk Tank Time! Who Wants To Ban Me?
[ QUOTE ]
The winner is The Once And Future King, for arguing against the human action axiom by claiming that people don't exist. Well done TOAFK, you got me banned. Iron, lock me up till October. [/ QUOTE ] Great I get you to ban yourself stating an arguement I didnt even make. Could not be sweeter.
|
|
#36
09-17-2007, 02:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dunk Tank Time! Who Wants To Ban Me?
[ QUOTE ]
Iron what the hell is wrong with you!? I said ban me, you mongleheaded cobblecook! [/ QUOTE ] Just post your MSpaint depiction of The Aristocrats joke in OOT.
|
|
#38
09-17-2007, 02:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dunk Tank Time! Who Wants To Ban Me?
[ QUOTE ]
Too late. [/ QUOTE ] A silver shilling to the man who can show me where I claim humans dont exist.
|
|
#39
09-17-2007, 02:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dunk Tank Time! Who Wants To Ban Me?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Too late. [/ QUOTE ] A silver shilling to the man who can show me where I claim humans dont exist. [/ QUOTE ] You disputed the premise that "human beings act". What exactly is your beef with that statement if humans exist?
|
|
#40
09-17-2007, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dunk Tank Time! Who Wants To Ban Me?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Too late. [/ QUOTE ] A silver shilling to the man who can show me where I claim humans dont exist. [/ QUOTE ] You disputed the premise that "human beings act". What exactly is your beef with that statement if humans exist? [/ QUOTE ] I dont dispute the premise, I suggest that the premise has more than one meaning. Or perhaps you can explain to me the true nature of being in a way that no one will dispute. I merely ask for definitions of what is exactly meant by the terms of the premise; human, being, action. None were supplied.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
