#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
omg im nittier than dubness1
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
maybe a stupid question but how do you datamine on Pokerstars ? I though it was not posssible
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
[ QUOTE ]
maybe a stupid question but how do you datamine on Pokerstars ? I though it was not posssible [/ QUOTE ] They have this stupid policy that you need to write your own datamining script to be able to do it as they prefer to give advantage to ppl with good programming skills. And also you better know that : [ QUOTE ] No it isn't, and to do so is against our terms of service. Datamining of observed hands is strictly prohibited. Of course, you are permitted to record hands in which you have actually played. [/ QUOTE ] You better make some fake accounts to datamine just in case they wish to ban you. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
what is the cleaner doing playing 5-10. everytime i saw that guy building some insane stacks in 25-50. b buddy in there too?. man what is going on?
was december that bad of a month for alot of highstakes guys? |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
[ QUOTE ]
No it isn't, and to do so is against our terms of service. Datamining of observed hands is strictly prohibited. Of course, you are permitted to record hands in which you have actually played. [/ QUOTE ] I know this isn't the time & place but their are some major ethical issues here - i.e. shouldn't we be berating and ostracising tcorbin16 and jsnipes28? All that we have that seperates us from the scum like RayBornet is the T&C's. If we condone breaking one Term, then it becomes a moral free-for-all. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
[ QUOTE ]
I know this isn't the time & place but their are some major ethical issues here - i.e. shouldn't we be berating and ostracising tcorbin16 and jsnipes28? [/ QUOTE ] I dont agree with that. If I played high stakes games there I would do everything to do datamine too as I would know that everybody else is doing it. Stars T&C is just retarted and need to be changed. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
Sorry not the time or place. Maybe I will start another thread to chat about this, in the internet forum.
It wasnt a shot at either of those players either -- I have done a little datamining on stars so I am guilty as the next man. I agree the T&C's are retarded, but that's not the point..... Ray's whole argumant is exactly the same as yours: The T&C's are retarded, and everyone else is doing it!!!! |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
ok i starte a new thread so we can have the debate elsewhere:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...e=0#Post8727560 |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I know this isn't the time & place but their are some major ethical issues here - i.e. shouldn't we be berating and ostracising tcorbin16 and jsnipes28? [/ QUOTE ] I dont agree with that. If I played high stakes games there I would do everything to do datamine too as I would know that everybody else is doing it. Stars T&C is just retarted and need to be changed. [/ QUOTE ] I won't play at pokerstars until they keep this stupid policy too. I know a huge part of HS players datamine, but I can' myself use another computer ... I am totally agree with punter |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
[ QUOTE ]
You better make some fake accounts to datamine just in case they wish to ban you. [/ QUOTE ] Since when do you need to be logged in to be mining PS? |
|
|