|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
AK bluffing, yeah. I'm just curious because I would fold TT here and super-insta call with QQ. Whether this is sound or not I don't know, I'd just draw the line with JJ and am wondering what the worst hand others are calling here with is and why.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
I know its not a reliable tell, but how fast did he shove? Like, I doubt he instashoves here with TT, JJ or even QQ.
Even with great odds I think this is a fold. Against JJ+ and two overs with a FD (AQhh AKhh) you are about 25/75. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
easy snap call? 66 and 55 not an option? I mean, it's generally not the situation, but ...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
From my experience on party, AA and KK here would be very rare. I don't even remember the last time I've seen someone slowplay either of them unless it was a fish just limping in pf.
Edit: My image is nothing crazy, taggy 19/16 although I may 3bet more than your average guy at these stakes. Edit 2: I don't remember how long he took to shove, multitabling... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
I know its not a reliable tell, but how fast did he shove? Like, I doubt he instashoves here with TT, JJ or even QQ. Even with great odds I think this is a fold. Against JJ+ and two overs with a FD (AQhh AKhh) you are about 25/75. [/ QUOTE ] I see posts like this all the time. Maybe you are right, maybe not. But I'm pretty sure I have never seen a reg fold JJ in a spot like this, ever. In villains spot, I shove a lot of hands, and a lot of bluffs, especially vs. ppl who 3-bet a bit liberally. And when I shove, I'm never thinking "Maybe he'll fold JJ", lol. I just have my doubts that any of you who advocate a fold here ever actually do it at the table. And by the way, I snap call because I 3-bet just light enough to piss people off and get bluff-shoved on a lot, and because I am a station. |
|
|