Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2007, 02:49 AM
$upermad4it $upermad4it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 705
Default NL600 99 vs river bluff?

Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $3/$6 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $636.00
Hero (BB): $605.00
UTG: $581.00
MP: $787.85
CO: $689.00
BTN: $680.00

Preflop: Hero is dealt 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players)
UTG folds, MP calls $6.00, CO calls $6.00, <font color="red">BTN raises to $36.00</font>, SB folds, Hero calls $30.00, MP folds, CO calls $30.00

Flop: ($117) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 Players)
Hero checks, CO checks, BTN checks

Turn: ($117) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (3 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $72.00</font>, CO folds, BTN calls $72.00

River: ($261) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $168.00</font>, [i]Hero ?

villian is 17/13 I probably shoulda just 3 bet pre but given that I didn't am I looking at a river bluff here enough to call?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-19-2007, 06:45 AM
Burdzthewurd Burdzthewurd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taco on Oct. 30 hurrah
Posts: 2,112
Default Re: NL600 99 vs river bluff?

I dunno, looks like a value-bet and Axdd got there, I feel like I see more bluffs when Villain bets full pot, I think folding is ok.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-19-2007, 01:00 PM
Erik W Erik W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Linköping
Posts: 582
Default Re: NL600 99 vs river bluff?

1.You can't call river
2. The hand looks real weird from his side.

What does he have? AT
Will he ever call Ax on turn 3 way, probably not.
Slowplayed set? Not likely but could be, too drawwy flop.

It doesn't make sense but you cannot call anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-19-2007, 01:28 PM
fringsrache fringsrache is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,021
Default Re: NL600 99 vs river bluff?

i was about to post almost the same hand with the same valueish looking betsize on ace river.
if villain can lay down a hand would a crai be pretty sexy? can he ever have a hand here he can call with except maybe AT?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-19-2007, 01:28 PM
killphilNI killphilNI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Getting the benefit of the doubt
Posts: 407
Default Re: NL600 99 vs river bluff?

I don't think Axdd is a big part of his range, he almost always cbets the flop with this.

Meh, I think there are enough busted draws there to call this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-19-2007, 08:34 PM
Pog0 Pog0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,366
Default Re: NL600 99 vs river bluff?

[ QUOTE ]
i was about to post almost the same hand with the same valueish looking betsize on ace river.
if villain can lay down a hand would a crai be pretty sexy? can he ever have a hand here he can call with except maybe AT?

[/ QUOTE ]

what calls on the turn and valuebets the river that is worse than 2p? If he's at all capable of vb'ing Tx here, then easy fold, but this looks like a pretty muggy situation where he typically has a very polarized range.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-19-2007, 09:37 PM
Drag007 Drag007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 260
Default Re: NL600 99 vs river bluff?

i think villain can vbet KT or QT here given hero's line
i'd also be very worried about AT
i'd probably fold, b/c i can't put him on a busted draw (besides J9..yeah)

It's a closer decision if u think he checks behind the flop w/77 55, or 76 65 etc then turns his hand into a bluff on the river, but after two ppl limp and he raises, given that he's 17/13 its hard to put him on SCs, so that leaves 77 and 55 as the only possibilities you're beating here really...and a lot of ppl would limp those hands in this situation anyway.

i'd say he mostly likely has AT or KT
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.