|
|
#251
05-10-2005, 08:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
DERB Update:
Doesn't seem like the new influx of players is a good thing for DERB. Now there's 100 DERBs, and his corner of the market is getting crowded. Let the slide begin. Either that, or my one hour sample size is too small. 
|
|
#252
05-10-2005, 08:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
DERB Update: Doesn't seem like the new influx of players is a good thing for DERB. Now there's 100 DERBs, and his corner of the market is getting crowded. Let the slide begin. Either that, or my one hour sample size is too small. [/ QUOTE ] Nah, I have DERB up 4625 in 476 hands today.
|
|
#254
05-10-2005, 09:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] There is not a 1 in 50 chance that he is good here. I would never cap worse than AJ here on purpose. [/ QUOTE ] This is my favorite analysis of the hand. Clearly the universe revolves around James, and all players should act accordingly. - Andrew www.pokerstove.com [/ QUOTE ] The world no, but when playing a hand against me, your play oughta revolve aruond how I play. You are still stupid. -James
|
|
#255
05-10-2005, 09:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
The world no, but when playing a hand against me, your play oughta revolve aruond how I play. You are still stupid. -James [/ QUOTE ] Your smart enough to realize that DERB might have imperfect knowledge of you and how you play your hands. PS - calling Andrew stupid is silly, he clearly is not and makes your position look weak.
|
|
#257
05-10-2005, 10:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The world no, but when playing a hand against me, your play oughta revolve aruond how I play. You are still stupid. -James [/ QUOTE ] Your smart enough to realize that DERB might have imperfect knowledge of you and how you play your hands. PS - calling Andrew stupid is silly, he clearly is not and makes your position look weak. [/ QUOTE ] He is stupid because he is continuing to pursue an indefensible position even after he has been shown to be in error countless numbers of times. I'm sure he is of above average intelligence, but he can't admit when he is wrong and he resorts to insults instead of providing any evidence to the contrary. Look at his last response. It's basically a flowery way of saying "He must be a winner because he has won so far." He refuses to understand that the discussion is taking place in the context of "this guy has incredible results, but apparently plays a losing style of poker - let's figure out what's going on." He's basically just an old man version of the "PWNED LOL!" mindset. Keep saying how right you are until people finally believe you. If he comes forward with some actual calculations or evidence then I'll be more receptive to his arguments, otherwise, he can pretty much go [censored] himself. -James
|
|
#258
05-10-2005, 10:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] PS - calling Andrew stupid is silly, he clearly is not and makes your position look weak. [/ QUOTE ] Hmm, you must have missed this thread... DERB [/ QUOTE ] Classic. You're batting a high percentage with these types of posts recently. -James
|
|
#259
05-10-2005, 11:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] PS - calling Andrew stupid is silly, he clearly is not and makes your position look weak. [/ QUOTE ] Hmm, you must have missed this thread... DERB [/ QUOTE ] Posting a link to the thread we're in is awesome.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
