Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 10-09-2007, 08:56 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
So, he says that a Latin American currency is far in the future. He says he and Bush proposed the FTAA. He says Chavez is anti-FTAA. When asked if there would be an analogue of the Euro, he says that would be a long, long term thing. He says the first step towards economic integration is free trade agreements, and then later, maybe more.

Things he does not say: "Yes, there will be an amero."

[/ QUOTE ]

so let me get this straight, US and mexico admit they are working towards an amero currency, they admit it, but people who oppose it, who say, no, this is bad policy, those people are called conspiracy theorists and not allowed to participate in what is obviously a political question.

do you see the doublethink?
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 10-09-2007, 09:00 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
Last week, WND reported BankIntroductions.com, a Canadian company that specializes in global banking strategies and currency consulting, is advising clients the amero may be the currency of North America within 10 years.

[/ QUOTE ]

quote from the wnd article.

so you're saying that there can be no debate on this since it is 10 years away. well, when is debate "allowed"? Is social security a conspiracy theory is you're less than 40 years old?
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:22 PM
bobman0330 bobman0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Billion-dollar CIA Art
Posts: 5,061
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So, he says that a Latin American currency is far in the future. He says he and Bush proposed the FTAA. He says Chavez is anti-FTAA. When asked if there would be an analogue of the Euro, he says that would be a long, long term thing. He says the first step towards economic integration is free trade agreements, and then later, maybe more.

Things he does not say: "Yes, there will be an amero."

[/ QUOTE ]

so let me get this straight, US and mexico admit they are working towards an amero currency, they admit it, but people who oppose it, who say, no, this is bad policy, those people are called conspiracy theorists and not allowed to participate in what is obviously a political question.

do you see the doublethink?

[/ QUOTE ]

People who postulate a conspiracy to introduce the amero without discussion at some point in the near future are conspiracy theorists. The hypothetical people who are opposed to the amero without making up conspiracies are not conspiracy theorists. (Wrong, but not conspiracy theorists)
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:27 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
The hypothetical people who are opposed to the amero without making up conspiracies are not conspiracy theorists. (Wrong, but not conspiracy theorists)

[/ QUOTE ]

why are they wrong if bush and mexico are working towards it?
were the jews who opposed hitler in 1933 conspiracy theorists? I mean they didn't go to the camps for ten years.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:32 PM
Mempho Mempho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: $45,496 from Home
Posts: 1,355
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So, he says that a Latin American currency is far in the future. He says he and Bush proposed the FTAA. He says Chavez is anti-FTAA. When asked if there would be an analogue of the Euro, he says that would be a long, long term thing. He says the first step towards economic integration is free trade agreements, and then later, maybe more.

Things he does not say: "Yes, there will be an amero."

[/ QUOTE ]

so let me get this straight, US and mexico admit they are working towards an amero currency, they admit it, but people who oppose it, who say, no, this is bad policy, those people are called conspiracy theorists and not allowed to participate in what is obviously a political question.

do you see the doublethink?

[/ QUOTE ]

People who postulate a conspiracy to introduce the amero without discussion at some point in the near future are conspiracy theorists. The hypothetical people who are opposed to the amero without making up conspiracies are not conspiracy theorists. (Wrong, but not conspiracy theorists)

[/ QUOTE ]

I certainly don't think that it will just show up one day by surprise. I think that it will become a part of the public dialogue for some time and a number of pundits will tell us just why we need it. Knowing something that contradicts popular opinion, however, often gets one labeled as a conspiracy theorist.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:36 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
I certainly don't think that it will just show up one day by surprise. I think that it will become a part of the public dialogue for some time and a number of pundits will tell us just why we need it. Knowing something that contradicts popular opinion, however, often gets one labeled as a conspiracy theorist.

[/ QUOTE ]

you mean like the patriot act? or like the now legalized phone tapping spying? or torture?

the blueprint is clear. lie, lie, lie, say it doesn't exist, and then say it's a done deal, we needed it, can't oppose it now.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:42 PM
Mempho Mempho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: $45,496 from Home
Posts: 1,355
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I certainly don't think that it will just show up one day by surprise. I think that it will become a part of the public dialogue for some time and a number of pundits will tell us just why we need it. Knowing something that contradicts popular opinion, however, often gets one labeled as a conspiracy theorist.

[/ QUOTE ]

you mean like the patriot act? or like the now legalized phone tapping spying? or torture?

the blueprint is clear. lie, lie, lie, say it doesn't exist, and then say it's a done deal, we needed it, can't oppose it now.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't disagree with you at all. It's sick.

Most people don't want to know the truth.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 10-10-2007, 04:00 AM
illeagle illeagle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: penis on my back, frighten me
Posts: 1,839
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
So am I incorrect in assuming that the Amero discussion is basically one facet of this issue.


I really thinks are getting [censored] up everywhere. The recent housing problem here in the US is now having far reaching effects around the country and the world.

I want to know how this problem occured in this first place. The mere idea that adjustable loans of these amounts would be legal in the first place is insane to me. Makes me wonder why they were allowed, and by who.

People had to realize hundreds of thousands of people would be defaulting.

What was the intentions behind this? Making people indentured servants.


Also I am starting to question even moreso why Bush wanted to make all these illegals citizens. What was his intention there.


Things are really [censored] up man, really [censored] up. Our dollar is losing value around the world. Bush Admin doesn't seem to care.

[/ QUOTE ]
Let me jump in here and straighten you out on something real quick. Bush is a Globalist first, a Mexican second, a [censored] third, and an American somewhere around 17th.

And God bless the country where a person can freely say that...too bad now I'm probably on a watch list.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 10-12-2007, 03:21 AM
BigBuffet BigBuffet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In the thick of it
Posts: 1,063
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
There is absolutely no evidence that the Federal Reserve intended to create the Great Depression. Such a motive would have made no sense from the Fed's point of view. The Depression created a highly unstable economic and political environment. Why would it have intentionally created the sort of conditions that would have seriously endangered its own existence?

[/ QUOTE ]

It would make sense if:
1) The wealthiest people knew what was going to happen based on the Fed's policies during the 1920's and therefore were able to cash out at the top and buy everything back very cheap in the 1930's

and

2) Knew that the incoming president was a socialist who not only would protect the Fed but also institute programs that would lay the foundation for the on-going erosion of the economic and political health of this couuntry.

And btw if you want to talk about a real anti-Fed guy, how about Charles Lindbergh Sr...
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 10-12-2007, 04:20 AM
BigBuffet BigBuffet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In the thick of it
Posts: 1,063
Default Re: Amero Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
So, he says that a Latin American currency is far in the future. He says he and Bush proposed the FTAA. He says Chavez is anti-FTAA. When asked if there would be an analogue of the Euro, he says that would be a long, long term thing. He says the first step towards economic integration is free trade agreements, and then later, maybe more.

Things he does not say: "Yes, there will be an amero."

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL. Same pattern as in Europe. "Just a bill to allow trucks to drive around delivering goods faster and cheaper".

"Oh, btw we now need a common currency."

"Oh yeah, almost forgot...we need one harmonized constitution for Europe."

The same thing is planned for us. And it's been planned since Bush took office (literally [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] ).

Hudson Institute White Paper on SPP/NAU

The Hudson Institute seems to know which way the wind is blowing over the years...

When SaltCracka says were screwed, he's right.

A mass uprising won't happen. A mass Ghandi-like sit-down won't happen. And even if one of the two began, the storm-troopers would kill the participants. Protestors can't even exercise freedom of speech anymore without being considered terrorists.

The SPP/NAU will continue to be implemented outside of Congress. The Superhighway from Mexico to Winnepeg will be privately owned (as are most of the turnpikes in this country in case anyone didn't know). The currency issue is moot since the Federal Reserve is a private corporation usurping what Jefferson envisioned to be the realm of the internal treasury, so practice saying "I bet ___ Ameros".

One of the moronic aspects of the Superhighway is that Kansas City will have a PORT (does Kansas have any bodies of water?) where the Mexican trucks will be inspected. Inspect them after they are halfway through the US?? Oh, and the PORT will be MEXICAN territory! So why bother with any inspections?! Just let the Mexican trucks come in with truckloads of crap from China, truckloads of drugs, and truckloads of immigrants that the Mexican government doesn't want in thier country...

Yep, we're screwed.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.