Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > High Stakes MTT
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-05-2007, 05:23 AM
 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 226th at 2006 WSOP ME
Posts: 7,806
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

For clarity, how deep does everyone think we need to be to call pre here? I'll admit, if I was supposed to fold this PF, then this is a probably a sizeable leak in my game.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-05-2007, 06:01 AM
LuckyLloyd LuckyLloyd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dublin
Posts: 799
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

20k+ maybe?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-05-2007, 06:09 AM
THEOSU THEOSU is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: being awesome. duh.
Posts: 7,784
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

kramer,

i used to go on a baseline of calling with small pairs requiring 10-1 implied odds, but i've discovered that calling getting near 10-1 is -EV for the reasons stated above: i don't always get paid when i flop a set, and then there's the rare times that i flop a set and it's no goot.

i haven't established a firm baseline for myself yet, but i know it varies. against some opponents i will call getting even less than 10-1, because i think i'll be able to win the pot often enough without flopping the set. against others i might need as much as 15-20.

ah, the old, crappy 'it depends' argument.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-05-2007, 09:39 AM
coxquinn coxquinn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Making Aggressive Calls
Posts: 1,012
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

fold FP isnt super standard?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-05-2007, 12:20 PM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

Can anyone explain why folding pf is better than pushing preflop? I would often push as a semibluff/resteal. You can't be in that bad shape against the calling range.

Also, you obviously can't flat call and play for a set, and it is hard to know if you are ahead, but if you play well in this type of situation, calling seems viable.

IMO folding is a leak.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-05-2007, 02:37 PM
Cornell Fiji Cornell Fiji is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,888
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone explain why folding pf is better than pushing preflop? I would often push as a semibluff/resteal. You can't be in that bad shape against the calling range.

Also, you obviously can't flat call and play for a set, and it is hard to know if you are ahead, but if you play well in this type of situation, calling seems viable.

IMO folding is a leak.

[/ QUOTE ]

Betgo,
Can you explain why pushing preflop is better than raising to 4500-5000 preflop and shoving any flop?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 08-05-2007, 02:53 PM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone explain why folding pf is better than pushing preflop? I would often push as a semibluff/resteal. You can't be in that bad shape against the calling range.

Also, you obviously can't flat call and play for a set, and it is hard to know if you are ahead, but if you play well in this type of situation, calling seems viable.

IMO folding is a leak.

[/ QUOTE ]

Betgo,
Can you explain why pushing preflop is better than raising to 4500-5000 preflop and shoving any flop?

[/ QUOTE ]
That's fine too. With a small pp, villain tends to play correctly to your go and go. I like the overbet push resteal play myself, as villain almost never calls light.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 08-05-2007, 05:27 PM
 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 226th at 2006 WSOP ME
Posts: 7,806
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

[ QUOTE ]
kramer,

i used to go on a baseline of calling with small pairs requiring 10-1 implied odds, but i've discovered that calling getting near 10-1 is -EV for the reasons stated above: i don't always get paid when i flop a set, and then there's the rare times that i flop a set and it's no goot.

i haven't established a firm baseline for myself yet, but i know it varies. against some opponents i will call getting even less than 10-1, because i think i'll be able to win the pot often enough without flopping the set. against others i might need as much as 15-20.

ah, the old, crappy 'it depends' argument.

[/ QUOTE ]

So him raising to 3BB instead of 4BB+ actually has a huge effect on this hand, as the former makes it a lot closer to a call PF (but still questionable, I guess).
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 08-05-2007, 08:23 PM
sinderg sinderg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 99
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

if somehow i lose my mind and find my self just cold callin a standard button c-bet then i defo shove the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 08-05-2007, 09:54 PM
A_PLUS A_PLUS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Marrying a hater B!tch, and having hater kids!
Posts: 3,285
Default Re: Day 1 ME Hand - The Trouble With Small PPs

Here is the way I look at it.

There is no way that either call is a +EV play, unless we are getting our chips in on the turn. The biggest problem with the hand, is we really need committ a huge amount of our stack, and most likely turn our hand into a complete bluff somewhere , unless the other guy is a complete weak tight nit. Depending on any physical read, I am probably C/R all-in on the flop. It isn't the best way to play the hand, but is rarely a huge mistake if he c-bets consistently.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.