Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:43 AM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Why doesn\'t the NFL have a DL?

In MLB, you can put a guy on the 15 or 60 DL, depending on his injury severity. obviously this allows you to fill his spot on the 25 man roster with a healthy player, and allows you to bring a player back after an injury has healed. why doesn't the NFL have something similar?

I mean, the PUP is something, but I always found its restrictions weird. You can't bring a guy back until week 6 -why week 6?

and that doesn't have any relevance to late season injuries. if a key player gets hurt now and is going to miss significant time (say 6 weeks) you almost have to put him on IR which means he is out for the year. it's a big problem to have your 53 man roster filled with hurt players b/c you need everyone as special teamers, subs, etc.

is it just a $ issue? the owners don't want to have to pay a few other replacement type guys?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2007, 11:06 AM
polkaface polkaface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 286
Default Re: Why doesn\'t the NFL have a DL?

You only play with 45 active players (not counting the emergency QB) so essentially you do have 8 DL spots each week whether you want them or not.


Here is a link to an ESPN TMQ article that takes up your cause.

ESPN Article
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2007, 11:35 AM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Re: Why doesn\'t the NFL have a DL?

[ QUOTE ]
You only play with 45 active players (not counting the emergency QB) so essentially you do have 8 DL spots each week whether you want them or not.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok, so maybe I'm saying the 53 man roster should be 56 or 60 to account for guys you need to put on IR even though it's possible they could play in 2 months.

[ QUOTE ]
Here is a link to an ESPN TMQ article that takes up your cause.

ESPN Article

[/ QUOTE ]

makes me sad I agree with him [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:51 PM
Toro Toro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: one down two to go
Posts: 6,849
Default Re: Why doesn\'t the NFL have a DL?

I believe (could be wrong) that the 53 man roster was the "solution" to the NFL having no Disabled List. Before that was implemented there was no flexiblilty so that if you had a player that was hurt and you weren't sure if he could heal in time you had to play with a short roster.

With the 53 man roster you have the flexiblity to have 8 guys in limbo before you have to decide whether to DL someone. Seems like enough to me.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:15 PM
Richard Tanner Richard Tanner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now this is a movement I can sink my teeth into
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: Why doesn\'t the NFL have a DL?

[ QUOTE ]
I believe (could be wrong) that the 53 man roster was the "solution" to the NFL having no Disabled List. Before that was implemented there was no flexiblilty so that if you had a player that was hurt and you weren't sure if he could heal in time you had to play with a short roster.

With the 53 man roster you have the flexiblity to have 8 guys in limbo before you have to decide whether to DL someone. Seems like enough to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget the practice squad, that's 8 more. Still, as we're talking about in the other thread and should probably move here, I'm in the "IR needs tweaking" group.

Cody
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2007, 06:34 PM
tolbiny tolbiny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,347
Default Re: Why doesn\'t the NFL have a DL?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I believe (could be wrong) that the 53 man roster was the "solution" to the NFL having no Disabled List. Before that was implemented there was no flexiblilty so that if you had a player that was hurt and you weren't sure if he could heal in time you had to play with a short roster.

With the 53 man roster you have the flexiblity to have 8 guys in limbo before you have to decide whether to DL someone. Seems like enough to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget the practice squad, that's 8 more. Still, as we're talking about in the other thread and should probably move here, I'm in the "IR needs tweaking" group.

Cody

[/ QUOTE ]

The practice squad doesn't work like a DL, players have to be Cut from the 53 man roster first before being signed. They are FA once they are cut and can sign anywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2007, 06:36 PM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Re: Why doesn\'t the NFL have a DL?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I believe (could be wrong) that the 53 man roster was the "solution" to the NFL having no Disabled List. Before that was implemented there was no flexiblilty so that if you had a player that was hurt and you weren't sure if he could heal in time you had to play with a short roster.

With the 53 man roster you have the flexiblity to have 8 guys in limbo before you have to decide whether to DL someone. Seems like enough to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget the practice squad, that's 8 more. Still, as we're talking about in the other thread and should probably move here, I'm in the "IR needs tweaking" group.

Cody

[/ QUOTE ]

The practice squad doesn't work like a DL, players have to be Cut from the 53 man roster first before being signed. They are FA once they are cut and can sign anywhere.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, tell the Ravens about that
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.