|
|
#23
10-26-2007, 12:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: one of the sicker calls i\'ve seen in a while (bryce vs. schnibl0r)
[ QUOTE ]
agreed. when B bets the river his range is polarized to top pair+ or a missed draw. schnib beats all the missed draws and he's getting like 8:1. [/ QUOTE ] you don't beat high stakes HU playing that straightforward 
|
|
#24
10-26-2007, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: one of the sicker calls i\'ve seen in a while (bryce vs. schnibl0r)
[ QUOTE ]
limit [/ QUOTE ] shoulda bet more than 2k on the end
|
|
#25
10-26-2007, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: one of the sicker calls i\'ve seen in a while (bryce vs. schnibl0r)
[ QUOTE ]
i knew before opening the thread that the answer was "limit" [/ QUOTE ] Bryce and limit? Nowai!
|
|
#28
10-26-2007, 02:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: one of the sicker calls i\'ve seen in a while (bryce vs. schnibl0r)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] its wp by schniblor imo. [/ QUOTE ] agreed. when B bets the river his range is polarized to top pair+ or a missed draw. schnib beats all the missed draws and he's getting like 8:1. it's actually not that sick now that i look at it. [/ QUOTE ] Never played Bryce but I really disagree with this. Against a lot of guys Ax is hardly in their range here so Bryce could be 3 betting flop and value betting several worse pairs. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] you're right that B would/could play a ten or JJ-KK like this but even adding in those combos i think it's a call on the river getting 8:1
|
|
#30
10-26-2007, 02:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: one of the sicker calls i\'ve seen in a while (bryce vs. schnibl0r)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] its wp by schniblor imo. [/ QUOTE ] agreed. when B bets the river his range is polarized to top pair+ or a missed draw. schnib beats all the missed draws and he's getting like 8:1. it's actually not that sick now that i look at it. [/ QUOTE ] I would expect T-J, to be a pretty standard value bet for bryce on the river not knowing any history. Is there some reason to think otherwise? [/ QUOTE ] No imo
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
