Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:20 PM
mondonman mondonman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southwestern Division
Posts: 606
Default NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Hero ($10)
Button ($11.75)
SB ($8.65)
BB ($21.50)
UTG ($4.25)

Preflop: Hero is MP with T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $0.4</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB calls $0.35, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>.

Flop: ($0.90) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $0.7</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to $8.25</font>, Hero calls $7.55.

No way I am getting away here, right?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:21 PM
creamfillin creamfillin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SI. NY
Posts: 1,751
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

Can you ask for anything more?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-16-2007, 07:15 PM
KingKory KingKory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 157
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

You've got $1.10 invested, and you're contemplating calling off a BI. You can most definitely get away here, and you probably should.

Best-case scenario villain turns over KQcc, and you guys flip for it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-16-2007, 07:49 PM
mondonman mondonman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southwestern Division
Posts: 606
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

[ QUOTE ]
Best-case scenario villain turns over KQcc, and you guys flip for it.

[/ QUOTE ]
That surprises me. I would think its the worst-case scenario.
Do you really think there is a big possibility of him holding a better hand than botton 2pair and playing the monster like this? Totally over c/rŽing on the flop?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2007, 08:07 PM
KingKory KingKory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 157
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

[ QUOTE ]

That surprises me. I would think its the worst-case scenario.


[/ QUOTE ]
Naw, worst-case scenario is him turning over AT/TT/77 like he did [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] And you drawing virtually dead.

[ QUOTE ]
Do you really think there is a big possibility of him holding a better hand than botton 2pair and playing the monster like this? Totally over c/rŽing on the flop?

[/ QUOTE ]
Let's look at it from his perspective -- there's a million draws out there, and an Ace. Plenty of hands that could draw out on him, or pay him off.

In most cases, a villain probably wouldn't overplay a monster in this fashion, and you'd be totally right...but why risk it? You have 11bb's invested, and you're risking 80.

I'm not saying it's the worst call in the world, I'm saying it's a 50/50 call at best. Overbetting monsters is how regulars beat 10NL on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-16-2007, 11:43 PM
Mal_Pais Mal_Pais is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Down East
Posts: 853
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

No reads on Villian?

This is a tough spot. He's not going to put us on T7. But that's a big bet he made, an all-in check-raise. If he was a 2+2er, I'd put him on a draw and call. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

I've had a few beers and I've never been good at math, but I recall something called Bayes Theorem. I don't understand it, but its less likely that he has 77 or TT, given our cards. AT and A7 seem like the hands that we're most concerned about, but its still harder for him to make those hands, given our cards.

Considering the size of the pot, I probably fold and go back to nitting a sweater.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-17-2007, 11:56 AM
mondonman mondonman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southwestern Division
Posts: 606
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

That surprises me. I would think its the worst-case scenario.


[/ QUOTE ]
Naw, worst-case scenario is him turning over AT/TT/77 like he did [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] And you drawing virtually dead.

[/ QUOTE ]
He flipped AK and didnŽt improve.
I was just wondering because this bet looked terribly donkish to me, advertising a FD or TPGK. After these posts I suspect I should be more suspicious when something like that happens.
Are moves like that with monsters common at microstakes?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do you really think there is a big possibility of him holding a better hand than botton 2pair and playing the monster like this? Totally over c/rŽing on the flop?

[/ QUOTE ]
Let's look at it from his perspective -- there's a million draws out there, and an Ace. Plenty of hands that could draw out on him, or pay him off.

In most cases, a villain probably wouldn't overplay a monster in this fashion, and you'd be totally right...but why risk it? You have 11bb's invested, and you're risking 80.

I'm not saying it's the worst call in the world, I'm saying it's a 50/50 call at best. Overbetting monsters is how regulars beat 10NL on a daily basis.

[/ QUOTE ]
If I am "right in most cases" with calling, then I have to call. ItŽs +$EV. I am not afraid of variance at NL10 [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-17-2007, 06:01 PM
Dave I Dave I is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,090
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

I snap call this the vast majority of the time. It is almost always what you said he had, a draw or a hand they turned into a bluff (under pair). Sure, sometimes they flip a better hand but not often enough.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-17-2007, 06:13 PM
IceMuncher IceMuncher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 396
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

Easy call imo. I almost never see a hand better than ours here.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-17-2007, 07:29 PM
PwnSauce PwnSauce is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 84
Default Re: NL10: bottom 2pair monster-c/rŽed

I call here and reload if beat. Probably flush draw, pair plus flush draw maybe combo draw. Either way you're beating a lot of hands and when you do lose its against unlikely hands like TT, 77, A7 ,AT. Not calling here is kinda noobish imo.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.