Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-06-2006, 03:06 PM
bizaff bizaff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 218
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

How do you think these statements are different?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not so much concerned with only getting called by a better [hand], as I am with keeping the pressure on when I think I have the winning hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
There's no value in bettiing if only a better hand can call. Betting is -EV in that case if no hand we beat will call.


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 02-06-2006, 03:08 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Old Right
Posts: 7,937
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

[ QUOTE ]
And your point?

[/ QUOTE ]

No ppoint really, just providing information.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 02-06-2006, 03:10 PM
fishfather fishfather is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 943
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

Okay--what info are you providing? That hero is most likely behind if called?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-06-2006, 05:41 PM
Dave I Dave I is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,090
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

[ QUOTE ]
I am guessing it will not be pretty when you reveal my donktastic hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

You held K9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. I then immediately proceeded to add you to my buddy list since I realized you really earned your title. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Obviously j/k..

I'm sure you would have folded if my mouse even hovered over the bet button.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 02-06-2006, 05:45 PM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Trying to be the shepherd
Posts: 18,437
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am guessing it will not be pretty when you reveal my donktastic hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

You held K9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. I then immediately proceeded to add you to my buddy list since I realized you really earned your title. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Obviously j/k..

I'm sure you would have folded if my mouse even hovered over the bet button.

[/ QUOTE ]

I should have typed gamboool in the chat box with my turn call [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 02-06-2006, 05:49 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I guess the main reason why your post puzzled me is because I vb any river when I think I have the best hand. I'm not so much concerned with only getting called by a better one, as I am with keeping the pressure on when I think I have the winning hand.

And so when you say 'don't bet, 'cause only a better hand calls'--I say, yeah, okay with marginal hands I agree. But not with good hands on non scary boards. Bet--even if you expect a fold much of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

From TOP:

[ QUOTE ]
When you bet for value on the end after your opponent has checked, you must figure your hand has better than a 50-50 chance of winning when you are called. In fact, you have to figure it has at least abouta 55 percent chance of winning for those time when your opponent is planning to check-raise. With three-of-a-kind against a flush drawm you are certainly the favorite, but you are not the favorite if your opponent calls. yet to show a profit on your last round bets, clearly you must be the favorite when your opponent calls.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

vulture,

Sklansky doesn't address metagame factors here. If I'm playing a lot of pots against a calling station (who has started to call down my bluffs with very mediocre holdings), I will often make a very think (maybe slightly -EV) value bet on the end. The reason is that I don't want to think that he can call my flop cont bet, check turn and river and get a cheap showdown when he has 2nd pair or whatever. I like to protect the money I put into the pot, and a very thin river value bet is a way to establish that people can't just start calling a single bet and take down pots with hands like 7T on 47Q against my AK (just an example).
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 02-06-2006, 08:01 PM
Push_Fold Push_Fold is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Making pointless posts
Posts: 1,628
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am guessing it will not be pretty when you reveal my donktastic hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

You held K9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. I then immediately proceeded to add you to my buddy list since I realized you really earned your title. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Obviously j/k..

I'm sure you would have folded if my mouse even hovered over the bet button.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you checked the river? Why?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 02-06-2006, 08:13 PM
Unabridged Unabridged is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 968
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

i'd bet $20 and pray he comes over the top sensing weakness.
if he hit a miracle with 6s4s or As4s, that sucks
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 02-06-2006, 08:30 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Old Right
Posts: 7,937
Default Re: Bottom Set vs. 4_2_It

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I guess the main reason why your post puzzled me is because I vb any river when I think I have the best hand. I'm not so much concerned with only getting called by a better one, as I am with keeping the pressure on when I think I have the winning hand.

And so when you say 'don't bet, 'cause only a better hand calls'--I say, yeah, okay with marginal hands I agree. But not with good hands on non scary boards. Bet--even if you expect a fold much of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

From TOP:

[ QUOTE ]
When you bet for value on the end after your opponent has checked, you must figure your hand has better than a 50-50 chance of winning when you are called. In fact, you have to figure it has at least abouta 55 percent chance of winning for those time when your opponent is planning to check-raise. With three-of-a-kind against a flush drawm you are certainly the favorite, but you are not the favorite if your opponent calls. yet to show a profit on your last round bets, clearly you must be the favorite when your opponent calls.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

vulture,

Sklansky doesn't address metagame factors here. If I'm playing a lot of pots against a calling station (who has started to call down my bluffs with very mediocre holdings), I will often make a very think (maybe slightly -EV) value bet on the end. The reason is that I don't want to think that he can call my flop cont bet, check turn and river and get a cheap showdown when he has 2nd pair or whatever. I like to protect the money I put into the pot, and a very thin river value bet is a way to establish that people can't just start calling a single bet and take down pots with hands like 7T on 47Q against my AK (just an example).

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont think Sklanksy needs to address metagame factors, as you could probably consider that as part of your assessment of whether you are ahead or not. But good food for thought.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.