Foxwoods 1/2 NL game

[IgorSmiles]

[ QUOTE ]
Play a smart lag style and stack or outplay the nits with funny hands. Just make sure you can afford to lose 2-3 full buy ins a session.

[/ QUOTE ]

Shhh!

[tomek322]

the woods is a joke... 900 should be a sufficient bankroll for that game. old and new... difference you win more faster.

[metropole]

wow, i can't believe how many replies this post got. i was just curious when i asked about the time charge. it was a big deal in when the max buy in was $100. you could sit down in the middle of a dealers shift, get hit up for time, and when the new dealer came in 15 minutes later, get hit again. after two orbits, you're down $16. with a $300 buy in the time isn't worth thinking about.

i went down the other day just to get a feel for how
the game is playing now. you guys weren't kidding, this game is a softer than ever, the biggest difference is now you win more faster, indeed.

thank you all for your input. this forum is great.

[Osprey]

I played the 2-5 last Friday, and that game was ridiculous, 7 handed to the flop for $30 was fairly standard. Several of the players were terrible, and there was even a bluffing station. Did I just go at the best possible time, or is the game often like that? Because 1-3$ sounds pretty good from what you guys are saying.

[rograndom]

When it was $100/max players were more than willing to stick all their stack in the middle on the flop with TP/NK. Now that's it's $300/max those same players are still very willing to do the same thing. Come to think of it, I'm amazed those players are still around.