Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2007, 03:07 PM
oldbookguy oldbookguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wvgeneralstore.com
Posts: 820
Default Vegas Support For Online Poker / Gaming

In the past we were up against Vegas as a opponent to online gaming.

The tide seems to have turned.

www.eog.com is reporting MGM annouced support for Frank's Bill.

obg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-2007, 03:14 PM
PLO8FaceKilla PLO8FaceKilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 560
Default Re: Vegas Support For Online Poker / Gaming

wow that sounds like good news.
Can someone please copy and paste some of the text from that link into this thread?

I'm at work and cannot go to that link.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-2007, 03:17 PM
oldbookguy oldbookguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wvgeneralstore.com
Posts: 820
Default TEXT of Article Re: Vegas Support For Online Poker / Gaming

[ QUOTE ]
wow that sounds like good news.
Can someone please copy and paste some of the text from that link into this thread?

I'm at work and cannot go to that link.

[/ QUOTE ]

Internet Gambling: MGM Mirage Says It Is Ready For Online Gambling In the US
July 5, 2007

Casino operator MGM Mirage has given its backing to Barney Frank's proposed Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act, adding that it would get involved in online gambling as quickly as it could should the US legalise the market. Senior vice president Alan Feldman said that the Las Vegas-based firm would have a site up and running within a year, and predicted that all of the major entertainment companies would get involved in the sector at some level.

Feldman also said that MGM's attempt to operate an internet casino from the Isle of Man had failed because it was competing for only 30 per cent of the market, not enough to be profitable.

"But with the U.S. market under Frank's proposal, it would be profitable," he declared.


obg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2007, 03:41 PM
Uglyowl Uglyowl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: They r who we thought they were
Posts: 4,406
Default Re: TEXT of Article Re: Vegas Support For Online Poker / Gaming

Great news starting to get some of the Vegas casinos behind this. BIG MONEY!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2007, 04:41 PM
CountingMyOuts CountingMyOuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 250
Default Re: TEXT of Article Re: Vegas Support For Online Poker / Gaming

[ QUOTE ]
Great news starting to get some of the Vegas casinos behind this. BIG MONEY!

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps they have been behind all of this (UIGEA, etc.) all along. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Good news, nonetheless.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2007, 05:31 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default This is not as significant as you may think at first ...

MGM/Terry Lanni have ALWAYS been in favor of online gaming.

However, it may be that the rift between MGM (which wanted ALL online gaming legalized) and Harrahs, (which would take poker first) may be bridged IF Harrahs also comes out for Frank's bill.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-05-2007, 05:46 PM
Legislurker Legislurker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 728
Default Re: This is not as significant as you may think at first ...

Harrah's has more pull across the nation as well. Various Indian and local casinos and presences in state lobbying. After the pseudo-religious nuts, they have been our biggest enemies. Honestly, I think their brand sucks, and before Moneymaker they had almost no poker presence anywhere. I wish we had a clearer view of where they want to go on this. I think they have the clout to kill this bill for sure, and MAYBE to pass it through to the Bush desk by fair or foul means.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-06-2007, 06:06 PM
DrewOnTilt DrewOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: You talkin\' to me?
Posts: 3,054
Default Re: This is not as significant as you may think at first ...

[ QUOTE ]
MGM/Terry Lanni have ALWAYS been in favor of online gaming.

However, it may be that the rift between MGM (which wanted ALL online gaming legalized) and Harrahs, (which would take poker first) may be bridged IF Harrahs also comes out for Frank's bill.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is correct.

Lanni and MGM were part of the Lesley Stahl 60 minutes interview last year on Internet Gambling. They came out in strong support of regulation.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-08-2007, 08:56 PM
Legislurker Legislurker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 728
Default Re: This is not as significant as you may think at first ...

Majorwager is claiming Harrah's is on board.........I haven't seen this anywhere else. Anyone have a press release or statement on it?

http://majorwager.com/frontline-530.html

Edit: I love the dig at g911. Fell over laughing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-09-2007, 03:39 PM
Grasshopp3r Grasshopp3r is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Aurora, CO (suburb of Denver)
Posts: 1,728
Default Re: This is not as significant as you may think at first ...

With WSOP ME attendance down, Harrah's may be starting to see the effects of the UIGEA in real dollars.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.