Absolute Rigged?

[Josem]

[ QUOTE ]
Just read through the entire thread and found no proof of anything. I can dig through my own hand histories and find countless hands played out the exact same way. The PT stats entail such small sample sizes that they can not be taken seriously. Can't believe such a big stink is being made over this

[/ QUOTE ]

please do find similar HHs or stats. i'd like to see what you claim

[Pokeraddict]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just read through the entire thread and found no proof of anything. I can dig through my own hand histories and find countless hands played out the exact same way. The PT stats entail such small sample sizes that they can not be taken seriously. Can't believe such a big stink is being made over this

[/ QUOTE ]

please do find similar HHs or stats. i'd like to see what you claim

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes please find 90/75 players with infinite river AF's over hundreds of hands winning 30+BB/100 at limit and 300bb/100 @ NL. Especially at high limits.

[teddyFBI]

[ QUOTE ]
Just read through the entire thread and found no proof of anything. I can dig through my own hand histories and find countless hands played out the exact same way. The PT stats entail such small sample sizes that they can not be taken seriously. Can't believe such a big stink is being made over this

[/ QUOTE ]

stop being obtuse

[ktulu22]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just read through the entire thread and found no proof of anything. I can dig through my own hand histories and find countless hands played out the exact same way. The PT stats entail such small sample sizes that they can not be taken seriously. Can't believe such a big stink is being made over this

[/ QUOTE ]

stop being obtuse

[/ QUOTE ]

What did you just call me?

[Artsemis]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just read through the entire thread and found no proof of anything. I can dig through my own hand histories and find countless hands played out the exact same way. The PT stats entail such small sample sizes that they can not be taken seriously. Can't believe such a big stink is being made over this

[/ QUOTE ]

stop being obtuse

[/ QUOTE ]

What did you just call me?

[/ QUOTE ]

i still think you're acute.

[Botchman]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just read through the entire thread and found no proof of anything. I can dig through my own hand histories and find countless hands played out the exact same way. The PT stats entail such small sample sizes that they can not be taken seriously. Can't believe such a big stink is being made over this

[/ QUOTE ]

please do find similar HHs or stats. i'd like to see what you claim

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes please find 90/75 players with infinite river AF's over hundreds of hands winning 30+BB/100 at limit and 300bb/100 @ NL. Especially at high limits.

[/ QUOTE ]

VARIANCE BABY!!! VARIANCE!!! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[stereo]

Any News? Are the rumours true??

Cheers!

[Mike Haven]

[ QUOTE ]
It was in the original High Stakes Limit thread that got moved to the mods forum.




[/ QUOTE ]

It has been moved back.

[Henry17]

Interesting read. While it is all circumstantial it is pretty damning evidence.

Years ago when online poker was just starting there was a problem with the way the randomizing was done on one of the sites. It was just a programing error that accidentally limited the software to 86,400 out of the 8.07E67 possible deck orderings. The problem was noticed and fixed very quickly. I'm not saying this is the case here (and you'd hope almost a decade later that these types of programing issues wouldn't arise) but it could explain how the players seem to know what others are holding yet not implicate Absolute.

[Henry17]

Actually on second thought that couldn't happen with PT in wide use. The distribution of hole cards would be so off from what is expected that people would notice quickly.