|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What will you do if they reinstate the draft? | |||
| Enlist happily and fight for my country. |
   
|
21 | 14.00% |
| F that, this war is stupid. |
  
|
40 | 26.67% |
| Move to Mexico or Canada |
  
|
36 | 24.00% |
| BASTARD!! |
  
|
53 | 35.33% |
| Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#521
11-13-2007, 07:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***yankees official offseason thread*****
[ QUOTE ]
Would he have done 2 years 35 million? 4 years is to much IMO [/ QUOTE ] lol that would be absolutely idiotic. hmmm 4 years at 16m per year or two years at 17.5m/year. buhhhhhh. 
|
|
#523
11-13-2007, 12:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***yankees official offseason thread*****
[ QUOTE ]
Worst case scenario can't we just move him to 1st or DH in year 3 or 4 if he starts to suck? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but his production at 1B or DH wouldn't be that great. But it would probably be better than our 1B production this year. Jeez. But I can't imagine that will continue going forward.
|
|
#524
11-13-2007, 12:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***yankees official offseason thread*****
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Would he have done 2 years 35 million? 4 years is to much IMO [/ QUOTE ] lol that would be absolutely idiotic. hmmm 4 years at 16m per year or two years at 17.5m/year. buhhhhhh. [/ QUOTE ] 13m (or 13.1) per year, not 16... but I think your logic is still good. (52 divided by 4 is 13... but why should a poker player know that... [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img])
|
|
#525
11-13-2007, 12:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***yankees official offseason thread*****
[ QUOTE ]
Worst case scenario can't we just move him to 1st or DH in year 3 or 4 if he starts to suck? [/ QUOTE ] its been claimed, prob on this thread, that he's a former infielder who can play 1b well, unlike Piazza and Giambi.
|
|
#526
11-13-2007, 01:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***yankees official offseason thread*****
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Would he have done 2 years 35 million? 4 years is to much IMO [/ QUOTE ] lol that would be absolutely idiotic. hmmm 4 years at 16m per year or two years at 17.5m/year. buhhhhhh. [/ QUOTE ] 13m (or 13.1) per year, not 16... but I think your logic is still good. (52 divided by 4 is 13... but why should a poker player know that... [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]) [/ QUOTE ] i read that it was reported that there were incentives (plate appearances and other moderately easy achievable goals) in the contract that bring the value of the contract up to ~60m. is it just a 4/52m deal? hmm after checking cot's it looks like it's a regular deal. wtf where did i read otherwise
|
|
#528
11-13-2007, 05:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***yankees official offseason thread*****
Ahhh don't give him more than 2 years... AHHHHHH
seriously he will most likely be very mediocre as a closer in 2010 37 over 2
|
|
#529
11-13-2007, 05:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***yankees official offseason thread*****
[ QUOTE ]
Ahhh don't give him more than 2 years... AHHHHHH seriously he will most likely be very mediocre as a closer in 2010 37 over 2 [/ QUOTE ] Who cares? There's no salary cap.
|
|
#530
11-13-2007, 06:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***yankees official offseason thread*****
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ahhh don't give him more than 2 years... AHHHHHH seriously he will most likely be very mediocre as a closer in 2010 37 over 2 [/ QUOTE ] Who cares? There's no salary cap. [/ QUOTE ] because if he's under contract he's the closer... 2010 he won't be that great (in all likely hood) did u ever read my post... your post backed up my point without you even realizing it
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
