These pf percentages are unexpected...

[tarheeljks]

[ QUOTE ]
i don't see what's unexpected about this

[/ QUOTE ]

ditto

[LooseCaller]

[illegit]

[ QUOTE ]
I guess my dilemma is that KK vs K9s is such a dominating hand that it seems counter-intuitive that the presence of AA would all of a sudden put K9s ahead of KK.

[/ QUOTE ]
If brilliant leveling, then bravo

If not then, no it's not at all counter-intuitive. It should be very in line with any reasonable person's intuitions.

[SuperSnort]

i saw on one of the WPT season 4 tournies that Ac3c v Ah7c on a flop qc7d4c had a 30% chance of tie now thats wierd odds

[rakemeplz]

You have 1 out your hand completely sucks, period.

[yeah man]

[ QUOTE ]
i saw on one of the WPT season 4 tournies that Ac3c v Ah7c on a flop qc7d4c had a 30% chance of tie now thats wierd odds

[/ QUOTE ]

All I'm seeing is a turn and river of A-Q or Q-A....that's 30%? You must be mistaken.

[ocdscale]

[ QUOTE ]
I guess my dilemma is that KK vs K9s is such a dominating hand that it seems counter-intuitive that the presence of AA would all of a sudden put K9s ahead of KK.

[/ QUOTE ]

A hand of poker is winner take all. It doesn't matter that KK beats K9 most of the time, because KK also has to beat AA.

Put another way, in AA v KK v K9, KK will be second best hand a ton, but first only rarely. K9 will be the weakest hand the most often out of the three, but is more likely to be first than KK is.
Since best hand is the only one that gets paid, K9 has more equity.

*Excluding splits.

[PantsOnFire]

Ok, "uncle" you cutthroat probability bastards.

K9s called with 4:1 pots odds, so that was a good call right?

[Dangeresque]

[ QUOTE ]
Ok, "uncle" you cutthroat probability bastards.

K9s called with 4:1 pots odds, so that was a good call right?

[/ QUOTE ]

12% < 4:1 = Bad call.

[Jiganti]

[x]poll deserves an insta-bastard.