|
|
#22
07-24-2007, 05:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Moderator Vote/Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I don't think I'd mind modding, but I'd have to know more details. [/ QUOTE ] we cant have two shortstacker mods, thats not right. [/ QUOTE ] I'll mod a new shortstack forum? [/ QUOTE ] ixnay to a shortstacker forum. The less people who know about SS and the less people talking and thinking about it the better. [/ QUOTE ] For real...and we don't want to send Bottomset to an early grave!!! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] 
|
|
#24
07-24-2007, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moderator Vote/Discussion
I guess my first question is are there specific things not getting done that need to get done from a moderating perspective?
Anything that gets tagged notify moderator or someone PMs me, I try to get it taken care of in short order--regardless of if it is (Weekly session reviews, additions to master sticky, etc) There certainly is a fair argument to be made that full and active participate by a moderator is preferable. I know that my full participation has been lacking due to inability to surf at work (in addition to long hours), but if there are things slipping through the cracks (perhaps in the monthly chat thread) I'd prefer to hear about them and work to solve any problems that do exist?
|
|
#25
07-24-2007, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moderator Vote/Discussion
As things are right now, I don't think we need another moderator. I'm actually a little curious as to why most think we do. A moderator is put in place to monitor the forums and make sure rules are being followed, etc. I don't see any rules being broken really, and I think diebitter is doing quite a good job with everything. I know Berge has been extremely busy lately.
Should the forum decide to add an additional moderator, I would certainly support MTTR, bottomset, and CMAR. All three are excellent contributors and I'm positive they would treat all posters fairly and respectively as diebitter and Berge do. (That's the most important thing to me) I honestly was a bit concerned about bottomset only because when he first started posting here he was quite condescending most of the time. But he seems to have gotten away from that and has been extremely helpful in many ways to a lot of people here. Not to mention he has been a 2+2er for a very long time. So I definitely think he would take the position seriously and do a good job at this point. I would also support Learning Curve should she be interested in the position. EDIT to add I still support a forum split, but because I think it would help forum growth as a whole.
|
|
#26
07-24-2007, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moderator Vote/Discussion
nah berge, things are going fine. I have noticed a huge increase in microstakes hands being posted though and that might take away from some of the luster that would appeal to those that play higher. As for modding, its been fine, but you haven't been around much and I haven't seen Nation make an appearance in at least 3-4 months.
|
|
#30
07-24-2007, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moderator Vote/Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I haven't seen Nation make an appearance in at least 3-4 months. [/ QUOTE ] Is he still a mod here? [/ QUOTE ] Yea and we don't need a new mod, just reaplace nation w/ someone else. We only need 3 mod spots, hell we don't even need that many. However, there is no point in keeping Nation as a mod. So yea just replace him with someone else if people really feel we need a new one. And about the forum split, I really hate the idea. We barely have enough traffic as it is, splitting will just make things seem more dead. As long as people keep up w/ putting the limits of thier hands in the thread titles, there is no need for a split. I would like to see the mods of this forum locking and deleting a lot of the stupid "FR nitty?" and "shortstack" threads that pop up week after week. Specifically, Dynacrazes threads and the ones that are like that. (Nothing against him, just using his threads he started as exmaples of the things we dont need)
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
