#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rousso and Chad Brown collusion in WCOOP Main Event?
[ QUOTE ]
If they were colluding and he was low wouldn't he dump to her? Of course maybe he was trying to dump to her and she didn't realize it. lol [/ QUOTE ] Bigstack losing a small amount of equity + shortstack gaining a tonne of equity >>> Bigstack gaining a small amount and shortie busting. - Even more so if you can continue colluding. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rousso and Chad Brown collusion in WCOOP Main Event?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If you guys knew anything about game theory, which Vanessa studied at Duke, you'd know that there was no funny business going on. It's simple game theory, which Vanessa studied while at Duke. [/ QUOTE ] In which she studied game theory, while at Duke studying game theory, therefore she (at Duke) studied game theory. [/ QUOTE ] I hear she's cheating on Chad Brown with a guy named Andy Beal who is not a poker player, because when she finally gets onto High Stakes Poker, she wants to buy in with a cool million. Also, I hear that Chad Brown refuses to go 'downtown' if you get my drift... He says it's because the one time he actually did it, he was dealt rags. [/ QUOTE ] winner |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rousso and Chad Brown collusion in WCOOP Main Event?
[ QUOTE ]
I hear she's cheating on Chad Brown with a guy named Andy Beal who is not a poker player, because when she finally gets onto High Stakes Poker, she wants to buy in with a cool million. [/ QUOTE ] It's about time the HSP producers gave the poker community what it wants. Enough of these self professed poker "experts" getting on the show. We need people who have legitimate proof of their expertise...i.e. game theory degrees...preferably from Duke University. |
|
|