|
|
#11
11-20-2007, 06:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 1/2 KJs from small blind
Would a tight passive player still be in the hand with AQ and no diamond? I doubt it, otherwise he does not fit with the read that has been provided for him. The check raise on the flop told him that you either had a King or were pumping a draw. Once the diamond came on the turn, the only draw that he is still ahead of is J10 (no diamond). I doubt whether he would stick around to find out on the river. I really can't see him playing the way that he has without a diamond. If you check the river and he is passive, he probably won't bet without a flush. So I think you should check and fold to a bet. I hope that I am not being result orientated. The OP would have made a better problem if he had not given any of the river action.
|
|
#12
11-21-2007, 09:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 1/2 KJs from small blind
[ QUOTE ]
Would a tight passive player still be in the hand with AQ and no diamond? I doubt it, otherwise he does not fit with the read that has been provided for him. The check raise on the flop told him that you either had a King or were pumping a draw. Once the diamond came on the turn, the only draw that he is still ahead of is J10 (no diamond). I doubt whether he would stick around to find out on the river. I really can't see him playing the way that he has without a diamond. If you check the river and he is passive, he probably won't bet without a flush. So I think you should check and fold to a bet. I hope that I am not being result orientated. The OP would have made a better problem if he had not given any of the river action. [/ QUOTE ] It is a tight passive table, but we do not have any specific reads on villain.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
