Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha High

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-23-2007, 05:06 PM
pete fabrizio pete fabrizio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: big-ass yard
Posts: 2,250
Default Re: credit for nut full house v. credit for quads

[ QUOTE ]
Interesting points.

On the last part: QJ is better because the lock is less frequent (only QQJ). I'm not sure exactly what this means in practical terms (?)--that this player is more likely to be bluffing? or just that you're going to get raised less frequently so that you don't have to worry about it as much?

[/ QUOTE ]

more likely to be bluffing.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2007, 05:08 PM
CrushinFelt CrushinFelt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,071
Default Re: credit for nut full house v. credit for quads

I generally never give anyone credit for any of these hands ;p
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.