Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which play impressed you more?
Doyle's fold of QQ after the flop on a board of rags vs. Reese's KK 66 60.00%
Sexton's call on the turn and the river against Matusow with bottom pair, crappy kicker 44 40.00%
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:36 PM
HoldEmNewby HoldEmNewby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: \"Noony noony noo...\"
Posts: 2,019
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

not picking on you i'm just saying that just because your line is better than a bad line doesn't make it satisfactory. You were the one that started the whole searching for "optimal lines" and "maximizing expectation" banter so follow through and write off all lines which don't fit that description.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:39 PM
Suigin406 Suigin406 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: fire isiah and minaya
Posts: 8,613
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

on second thought, u might not get looked up a whole lot with a c/r on the flop, so maybe that's OK, but c/c shove is not good imo...

he's passive, y not just b/f or b/c here, it sounds std, but i do save the c/r for the aggro types
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:40 PM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

Isn't our hand the same as 32o here if we b/c? If when we bet we get shoved on it doesn't matter if we call or fold since it's around neutral EV anyways. So w/ 32o we bet and if we get shoved on we fold obviously and folding is neutral EV because we aren't losing anything (although it's ++++++++++EV compared to calling lol). So our decision after villain shoves is neutral EV in both spots. Hope this makes sense? But I'm not sure of the exact math w/ calling a shove w/ our draw. It may actually be -EV.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:41 PM
therealpk therealpk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 120
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

fold PF and you won't have to make these decisions
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:43 PM
Speedlimits Speedlimits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,780
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

[ QUOTE ]
not picking on you i'm just saying that just because your line is better than a bad line doesn't make it satisfactory. You were the one that started the whole searching for "optimal lines" and "maximizing expectation" banter so follow through and write off all lines which don't fit that description.

[/ QUOTE ]

b/c is the worst line
c/r is an OK line but not the best/worst.
c/c the flop, shove certain turns is the best line.

shove any J/Q/K/A turn. I actually like checking if I make my straight because it gives villain another chance to bluff or bet his weak made hand. Against tougher opponents I would just shove any turn after c/cing the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:43 PM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

why are we assuming villain will only shove or fold the flop?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:44 PM
Speedlimits Speedlimits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,780
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

[ QUOTE ]
fold PF and you won't have to make these decisions

[/ QUOTE ]

This is bad on so many levels.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:52 PM
SootedPower SootedPower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: berating anyone and everyone
Posts: 137
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

zzz

Playing reraised pots OOP with 57s is terrible.
Checkraising villains who only bluff a small part of their range is worse.

zzzzz
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-31-2007, 01:56 PM
Speedlimits Speedlimits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,780
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

[ QUOTE ]
zzz

Playing reraised pots OOP with 57s is terrible.
Checkraising villains who only bluff a small part of their range is worse.

zzzzz

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow both of these statements are wrong.

3betting OOP with suited gappers is fine if the villain opens light, just because he happened to call this time doesn't mean 3betting isn't optimal.

When checked too villain is betting MOST of his range, overcards/weak made hands/gutshots/overpairs.

So in conclusion, you have no clue how to play poker. Go back to sleep now.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-31-2007, 02:01 PM
traz traz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sleeping on stacks
Posts: 19,775
Default Re: 100NL 3bet Pot C/R

cr sucks because he's never folding once he bets imo. cc shove and b/c are way better. I probably b/c

I also hate the idea of someone who posts a hand and then goes on and on about how his action was best. Why even post the hand, you know best obviously
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.