Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > EDF
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2007, 07:10 PM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

http://www.kolotv.com/home/headlines/9089381.html

Wagered: $170 billion
Lost: $12.74 billion

Slots: $8.34 billion
Blackjack: $1.4 billion
Baccarat: $900.4 million
Craps: $471.8 million
Sports betting: $175.7 million
Poker: $170 million
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2007, 07:16 PM
XXXNoahXXX XXXNoahXXX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 8,159
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

[ QUOTE ]
http://www.kolotv.com/home/headlines/9089381.html

Wagered: $170 billion
Lost: $12.74 billion

Slots: $8.34 billion
Blackjack: $1.4 billion
Baccarat: $900.4 million
Craps: $471.8 million
Sports betting: $175.7 million
Poker: $170 million

[/ QUOTE ]

Any idea how they calculate the poker?

Is that $170M in rake and tourney fees?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2007, 07:16 PM
amplify amplify is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Always Already
Posts: 18,027
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

but enough about Vinnie Vinh
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2007, 07:19 PM
iron81 iron81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Donk
Posts: 6,806
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

[ QUOTE ]
Sports betting: $175.7 million
Poker: $170 million

[/ QUOTE ]
Thinking about whether casinos will continue to keep poker rooms open, how profitable are poker rooms compared to sports books? We see that the revenue is about the same, but what about expenses? I believe that sports books have a much more established history in casinos than poker rooms, so if poker can produce a similar profit to sports books, we shouldn't see a mass closing of poker rooms in vegas.

I'm pretty sure the breakdown is by revenue generated, which for poker means rake. The sum of the different games is about equal to the total revenue figure of 12 billion.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-10-2007, 07:21 PM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

XXX,

Yeah, I'd assume that number is rake/fees from poker (you can prob find more detailed info at gaming.nv.gov).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2007, 07:22 PM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

iron,

Note that the figures do not include things like Keno and all the random table games, which probably account for most of the missing $$$.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2007, 07:40 PM
felson felson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,177
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

[ QUOTE ]
http://www.kolotv.com/home/headlines/9089381.html

Wagered: $170 billion
Lost: $12.74 billion

Slots: $8.34 billion
Blackjack: $1.4 billion
Baccarat: $900.4 million
Craps: $471.8 million
Sports betting: $175.7 million
Poker: $170 million

[/ QUOTE ]

12.74 B/ 17 B = 7.5% house edge. The article says that $8.3 B came from slots and $4.2 B from table games. The house edge for table games is ~2.5%, so the edge on slots must be around 10%.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2007, 07:46 PM
cbloom cbloom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: communist
Posts: 8,940
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

[ QUOTE ]

Thinking about whether casinos will continue to keep poker rooms open, how profitable are poker rooms compared to sports books? We see that the revenue is about the same, but what about expenses?

[/ QUOTE ]

Poker is just about the least profitable thing in a casino in terms of the floor space used, all the personnel and salaries. The main reason behind running poker these days is to get people in to stay and play the pit.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-10-2007, 08:08 PM
Boris Boris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 7,943
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

The small number for sports betting surprised me. I guess local bookies get most of the action.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-10-2007, 08:38 PM
jackflashdrive jackflashdrive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: one step ahead of the law
Posts: 467
Default Re: Gamblers lost $12.7 Billion in FY07 in Nevada

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.kolotv.com/home/headlines/9089381.html

Wagered: $170 billion
Lost: $12.74 billion

Slots: $8.34 billion
Blackjack: $1.4 billion
Baccarat: $900.4 million
Craps: $471.8 million
Sports betting: $175.7 million
Poker: $170 million

[/ QUOTE ]

12.74 B/ 17 B = 7.5% house edge. The article says that $8.3 B came from slots and $4.2 B from table games. The house edge for table games is ~2.5%, so the edge on slots must be around 10%.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's why the intelligent gambler plays the $100 slots, where the house edge shrinks to 3%.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.