Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2007, 11:54 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some way)

Uhm, FoF-type groups ARE the Party and the Party is them. They took over the Party in as smooth a movement as would have made Josef Stalin proud. Like Stalin, they seek to use the police power of the State and its prosecution of "non-believers" to force everyone to conform to their own beliefs

Like the Taliban, they want an absolute theocracy, in the name of their Diety, as they interpret His Will.

There is a world of difference between a Party of George H Bush and the Party of George W Bush/Dick Cheney.

FoF-type groups are, in a word, Un-American and I hope that moderate Republicans and Goldwater conservatives can oust their influence.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-11-2007, 12:53 AM
TheEngineer TheEngineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some way)

I agree with all of the above comments. I think we can show this is with our forthcoming 2007 KY gubernatorial race actions.

2008 will be a bloodbath for the Republican Party. I hope it will help them rediscover their roots.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2007, 11:13 AM
Uglyowl Uglyowl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: They r who we thought they were
Posts: 4,406
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some way)

We are now less than a year away from 2008 elections. Here is how the Senate is shaking out according to Rothenberg (7 Republican seats in danger vs. 1 Democratic) and 4 more Republican seats that could sway with further developments.

(Danger= Lean Takeover, Toss-up, Narrow Advantage for Incumbent Party )

http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.blo...e-ratings.html

Lean Takeover (1 R, 0 D)

VA Open (Warner, R)

Toss-Up (3 R, 1 D)
CO Open (Allard, R)
NM Open (Domenici, R)
Sununu (R-NH)
Landrieu (D-LA)

Narrow Advantage for Incumbent Party (3 R, 0 D)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Smith (R-OR)

Clear Advantage for Incumbent Party (4 R, 0 D)
NE Open (Hagel, R)
Dole (R-NC)
McConnell (R-KY)
Stevens (R-AK)

Currently Safe (11 R, 11 D)
ID Open (Craig, R)
Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Baucus (D-MT)
Biden (D-DE)
Durbin (D-IL)
Harkin (D-IA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Levin (D-MI)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2007, 02:44 PM
DeadMoneyDad DeadMoneyDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 814
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some way)

[ QUOTE ]
Uhm, FoF-type groups ARE the Party and the Party is them. They took over the Party in as smooth a movement as would have made Josef Stalin proud. Like Stalin, they seek to use the police power of the State and its prosecution of "non-believers" to force everyone to conform to their own beliefs

Like the Taliban, they want an absolute theocracy, in the name of their Diety, as they interpret His Will.

There is a world of difference between a Party of George H Bush and the Party of George W Bush/Dick Cheney.

FoF-type groups are, in a word, Un-American and I hope that moderate Republicans and Goldwater conservatives can oust their influence.

[/ QUOTE ]

The FoF types gain their influence because they are fully engaged more often than not in the primary elections. Thus gaining advantage in safe districts then using that leverage in presuring candidates in those and other General elections.

The FoF types are no more the party than any well organized group for the Dems. The Dems have the advantage of being pragmatic enough to throw people under the bus as needed.

Too many Republicans get what they deserve due to their limited participation in the process.


D$D
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2007, 08:55 PM
Fedorfan Fedorfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 379
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some w

With pat robertson endorsing giuliani, it wouldn't be to hard to imagine huckabee as his vp, this seems bad for us?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2007, 09:20 PM
TheEngineer TheEngineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some w

[ QUOTE ]
With pat robertson endorsing giuliani, it wouldn't be to hard to imagine huckabee as his vp, this seems bad for us?

[/ QUOTE ]

If Guiliani wins the nomination, he will likely want a Southerner or Westerner as his running mate. Huckabee will be on his short list, as will McCain. Huckabee actually may not be interested, as he seems pretty principled in his positions. If he is the nominee, FoF-types likely won't run their own candidate.

I think Giuliani/McCain is more likely at this point, I think. That's actually a good ticket for us in that it will weaken social conservatives (I'm no Giuliani backer), and will keep the social cons home on Election Day, helping us in Congressional races.

I hope a pro-poker presidential candidate will break through into the top tier soon.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2007, 10:16 PM
zimmer879 zimmer879 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 295
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some w

[ QUOTE ]
I hope the pro-poker presidential candidate will break through into the top tier soon.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:49 AM
TheEngineer TheEngineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some w

[ QUOTE ]
With pat robertson endorsing giuliani, it wouldn't be to hard to imagine huckabee as his vp, this seems bad for us?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think Pat Robertson's endorsement of Giuliani speaks volumes to the weakening of the Religious Right.

Social conservatives have had THE power within the Republican Party for so long that they EXPECTED the party to follow their dictates. We saw it with UIGEA. Dobson decided to end all online gaming, so FoF (with Harrah's and the NFL) simply told the GOP to do it. Fortunately, social conservatives aren't very pragmamtic. They overreached and got trounced last year. And, they haven't learned. Two KY candidates ran on purely social conservative platforms this year and got crushed. And, next year looks worse (though a lot can change in a year), especially with the congressional elections.

These big government social cons think this power even extends to primary voters, given that Dobson pretty much ordered them to not vote for Giuliani. LOL. However, it's becoming clear that rank-and-file party aren't buying into the big government repressive platform of the social conservatives. That's one reason the party lost so badly last year. So, the social conservatives are scrambling to keep whatever power they can. They're fracturing - Dobson isn't really supporting anyone (he's just against some candidates), Brownback endorsed McCain, Robertson essentially said "screw off Dobson" and endorsed Giuliani, while others endorsed Romney. Meanwhile, the only real social conservative in the race, Baptist minister Gov. Mike Huckabee, can't buy an endorsement from these guys, and he's complaining loudly.

This is good stuff for us. Hopefully this will all lead to a realignment of the GOP. Election losses tend to do that.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2007, 03:05 PM
Legislurker Legislurker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 728
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some w

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With pat robertson endorsing giuliani, it wouldn't be to hard to imagine huckabee as his vp, this seems bad for us?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think Pat Robertson's endorsement of Giuliani speaks volumes to the weakening of the Religious Right.

Social conservatives have had THE power within the Republican Party for so long that they EXPECTED the party to follow their dictates. We saw it with UIGEA. Dobson decided to end all online gaming, so FoF (with Harrah's and the NFL) simply told the GOP to do it. Fortunately, social conservatives aren't very pragmamtic. They overreached and got trounced last year. And, they haven't learned. Two KY candidates ran on purely social conservative platforms this year and got crushed. And, next year looks worse (though a lot can change in a year), especially with the congressional elections.

These big government social cons think this power even extends to primary voters, given that Dobson pretty much ordered them to not vote for Giuliani. LOL. However, it's becoming clear that rank-and-file party aren't buying into the big government repressive platform of the social conservatives. That's one reason the party lost so badly last year. So, the social conservatives are scrambling to keep whatever power they can. They're fracturing - Dobson isn't really supporting anyone (he's just against some candidates), Brownback endorsed McCain, Robertson essentially said "screw off Dobson" and endorsed Giuliani, while others endorsed Romney. Meanwhile, the only real social conservative in the race, Baptist minister Gov. Mike Huckabee, can't buy an endorsement from these guys, and he's complaining loudly.

This is good stuff for us. Hopefully this will all lead to a realignment of the GOP. Election losses tend to do that.

[/ QUOTE ]

Some 150 Bush administration officials were graduates of Pat Robertson's Regent University, including Monica Goodling, who put on such a lamentable performance before a House inquiry into the firing of nine US attorneys.

Text from the article Ugly posted. Put that together with the Robertson endorsement, Id think some high profile Bushtards will start endorsing him and thinking they will keep their jobs. Heres to getting drunk Nov 08 celebrating the Republicans only getting 35% of the vote. If the article is premium content and anyone wants a CNP let me know, its awful long or Id post it into the thread, definitely a good read.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2007, 12:54 AM
TheEngineer TheEngineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: Official 2008 Election Coverage (related to online poker in some w

How sad about the social conservative implosion. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Hey big government prohibitionists: Don't let me click my mouse, lose ALL your (non-Southern) seats in the House! Haha.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.