collusion?

[Vehn]

30/60 game. player A and player B softplay each other heads up. player A is LAG, player B TAG, maybe extremely so. player A open raises in late position, player B just calls from the SB with AA.

[Shadowrun]

if its heads up why would it matter? more money for the house?

[Vehn]

[ QUOTE ]
if its heads up why would it matter? more money for the house?

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[Shadowrun]

basically i was trying to say
if their is 2 chairs, and 2 people are colluding well they really cant make a profit can they because of the rake???
So why would they collude?
Never mind its not heads up (as i thought it was, you didnt mention the size of table) but if your saying late position .....

[Wheatsauce]

Wait...so are you saying that the SB is colluding against the BB? I'm confused.

[Vehn]

[ QUOTE ]
Wait...so are you saying that the SB is colluding against the BB? I'm confused.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes

I was not involved in the hand.

[Nate.]

I think this hinges on some questions of intent, but if I had to guess I'd say yes.

--Nate

[mrkilla]

Its the most mild form of it but yea soft playing is collusion everytime.

[jba]

[ QUOTE ]
Its the most mild form of it but yea soft playing is collusion everytime.

[/ QUOTE ]

but this example is a perfect example of why soft playing is in fact collusion.

[otnemem]

He check calls down from SB, or are you asking if just calling from the SB with AA preflop is collusion?