|
|
#11
10-13-2007, 04:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m stuck $6,000 in mid LHE
[ QUOTE ]
YOU HAVE SEVENTEEN THOUSAND POSTS AND YOU'RE PLAYING 1-2NL TALK TO ME ABOUT POKER LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL [/ QUOTE ] thats cuz I just switched to NL. I've played as high as 50/100 LHE. You play terrible 
|
|
#12
10-13-2007, 04:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m stuck $6,000 in mid LHE
I DONT CARE HOW HIGH YOU'VE PLAYED. LET'S PONDER WHY YOU'RE PLAYING 1-2NL NOW
OH OKAY THANKS. NO IM SURE YOU WERE A HUGE WINNER IN THE STARS 30 AND YOU LEFT IT FOR 1-2 BECAUSE IT WAS TOO EASY WINNING.
|
|
#13
10-13-2007, 04:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m stuck $6,000 in mid LHE
[ QUOTE ]
LET'S PONDER WHY YOU'RE PLAYING 1-2NL NOW [/ QUOTE ] 1.More games 2.Better games 3.More profit potential in NL (see reasons 1 and 2). 4.LHE is a farce none of that changes the fact you play bad. But whatever, im sure you'll be unstuck soon, only 600 more BB to go. good luck to you!! oh, and nice blog.....lolol
|
|
#14
10-13-2007, 04:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m stuck $6,000 in mid LHE
You forgot this reason
[x] suck at limit seriously if you think these hands are "terrible" then you are clearly a bad limit player. But I guess you admit that in number four. Either way you're a retard who sucks. Enjoy coming up with a witty response I'll never read, you're on ignore.
|
|
#16
10-13-2007, 05:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m stuck $6,000 in mid LHE
OP, you're betting when you have nothing. Nothing wins you nothing.
|
|
#17
10-13-2007, 05:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m stuck $6,000 in mid LHE
[ QUOTE ]
Enjoy coming up with a witty response I'll never read, you're on ignore. [/ QUOTE ] Since you can't read his responses, he said: [ QUOTE ] HU for rollz?? [/ QUOTE ] Though it looks like he's too late.
|
|
#19
10-13-2007, 06:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m stuck $6,000 in mid LHE
it's pretty dumb to just chime in and say these hands are awful. At least give a reason. Playing good poker = putting opponents on hands and determining what they are likely to do with the various hands they might hold, and then figuring out what decision performs best against their different hands and the decisions they might make.
I agree that against a lot of players, it would be bad to play like this. These particular opponents in hand one though had overcards a ton though, and BB is playing almost 100% of his range like this (call pf, check flop, check turn) up until his turn CR. then it is obv we are in troubletown and need to make a run for suckoutville. Hand 2 is more spewy imo. I was railing at the time, and he was taking some pretty gross beats or just getting coolered in biggish pots. I also disagreed with some of his plays, but he had some good reasoning behind some of them. Other hands were just bad though, like fighting too hard for a small pot vs someone that either obv has something or has no problem playing back at u with trash when you can't call their 4 bet and have no outs. Or other times he would openraise too lightly. Anyway, saying he sucks is going too far, because I know most people fall off their game when they are losing. This is especially easy to do online. I dunno why bbv is full of so many people that want to kick a guy when he is down. I understand the criticisms people have of FGators, because he just doesn't listen, and is pretty delusional. OP is aware he isn't a great player, but he's not terrible. He makes correct suggestions in strat threads, and analyzes his plays, and is trying to get better. That's what 2p2 is all about. It's not supposed to be about flaming eachother for no good reason.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
