Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:22 PM
theos theos is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6
Default 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

Most of the time playing the A-small suited hands is easy - you either get a flush draw and play it aggressively or you get out. But what about when you're drawing to or have got a flush that's not that nuts? I can't help thinking I've made a balls-up of every one of my bets. In my own mind I had reasons for each of them, but were any of them grounded in sensible poker thinking?

Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (8 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Reads after 30 or so hands: BB has been giving money away (90/18/1) and Button's play has seemed fairly loose-passive (27/4/1.5).

Preflop: Hero is SB with 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Button calls, Hero completes, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls, Button calls, Hero calls.

I get in for cheap when it first comes around; following the raise I reckon there's enough bets in the pot to make it worth another 0.50 to chase a flush.

Flop: (12 SB) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, UTG calls, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds, <font color="#CC3333">Button 3-bets</font>, Hero calls, BB calls, UTG calls.

I've got 6 players in the flop with me so it seems worthwhile to bet since I have a 35% chance for the flush. But then it's raised twice more and now I'm betting only because I've got the pot odds.

Turn: (12 BB) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, UTG folds, Button calls, Hero calls.

So I've hit my flush; BB's raising me and button's calling two. I'd like to raise again but chicken out.

River: (18 BB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks...

And if I wasn't scared before, I'm very worried once I see the river. Both BB and Button are representing strong hands and if they hadn't already hit a flush, they could still easily hold the required ace or queen.

So, how badly did I play? [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:27 PM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Recliner of Rage
Posts: 4,383
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

I would 3-bet the turn, neither of your opponents played the flop like a flush draw at all. My answer might change if BB wasn't an idiot but probably not. As played, plan on donk-calling the river if it isn't a spade, but since the 4th spade came out checking is probably OK because you have an easy fold if it's 2 bets back to you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:28 PM
sarsen sarsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nanny State
Posts: 1,271
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

3-bet the turn. It might be a spew, but I bet call the river.

Edit: I also like TheMainEvent's line. I also hate the fourth spade on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:35 PM
sccrneo sccrneo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the back of the short bus
Posts: 492
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

On the flop, I think I would rather check/raise since the bet is likely to come from the BB on your immediate left. Betting out gives BB a chance to raise and blow away the field. Check/raising is a better way to build this pot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:36 PM
Bigka79 Bigka79 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,006
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

3 bet the turn and see what happens. im putting BB on a over pair or a set. which shouldnt be a worry to you because you can beat all of the above unless he has pocket q's or a's with the spade in hand. however i need to 3 bet this turn and let him know i have him beat at this point. unless has aqs or a10s (only drawing hands that beat u on the turn that i can see him raising with perhaps a9s)either way i 3 bet the turn and if he caps i check call
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:40 PM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Recliner of Rage
Posts: 4,383
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

[ QUOTE ]
On the flop, I think I would rather check/raise since the bet is likely to come from the BB on your immediate left. Betting out gives BB a chance to raise and blow away the field. Check/raising is a better way to build this pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes very good point you really don't want to get isolated here as you have virtually no chance of winning the pot without hitting a [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:53 PM
ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: THREE AM
Posts: 11,405
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

checkraise the flop (provided at least 2 others call BB's lead). leading here is terrible as you likely face the field with 2 cold and lose customers (no need to clear J outs as you aint winning this with TPNK).

turn is even worse tho. if your gonna lead you HAVE to 3bet, noone has shown they have a flush.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:55 PM
swong4444 swong4444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 470
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

Flop: Good spot for a check-raise. BB will likely bet and you can trap more of the field to build a nice pot.
Turn: I like a 3-bet here, because you are often ahead, but I would feel a bit sick if it was capped. So, 3-bet for value and also see where you stand.
River: Check seems good, and I'd call but not overcall for 1 bet.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-21-2006, 03:59 PM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Recliner of Rage
Posts: 4,383
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

[ QUOTE ]
Flop: Good spot for a check-raise. BB will likely bet and you can trap more of the field to build a nice pot.
Turn: I like a 3-bet here, because you are often ahead, but I would feel a bit sick if it was capped. So, 3-bet for value and also see where you stand.
River: Check seems good, and I'd call but not overcall for 1 bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

If I check the river the only thing that's getting me to fold is the button waking up and betting/raising. The only card button can have to call BB's bet and beat us is the Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2006, 04:09 PM
no1spec no1spec is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 32
Default Re: 0.50/1 Non-nut flush play

I think preflop is fine, 3 limpers ahead of you see a flop with the suited cards.
Flop, I wouldn't bet this with the preflop raiser next to act. Check this looking to raise BB when it comes back to you. If it was reraised I may just call as I don't want to nock anyone out.
Turn, this probably plays a little different based on flop, but I lead here. To much possiblity that it could get checked through. I reraise the turn.
River, that sucks. I'm probably to weak but I check/call. If it is two back to me I would wan't to fold but with buttons play I think he may have a set more than a flush. Not sure about BB, QQ with a spade? KK no spade? AA with A of spade?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.