Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-31-2007, 04:06 AM
KingsTown KingsTown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 171
Default 88 v. LAG

Ultimate Bet - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $2/4
Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)

SB: $443.20
BB: $381.50
UTG: $237
MP: $648
Hero (CO): $398
BTN: $394

Preflop: Hero is dealt 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players)
UTG folds, <font color="red">MP raises to $14</font>, Hero calls $14, 3 folds

Flop: ($34) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">MP bets $20</font>, Hero calls $20

Turn: ($74) K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">MP bets $44</font>, Hero calls $44

River: ($162) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">MP bets $112</font>, Hero folds

1. MP was playing 43/20 but this was only after about 30-35 hands. Should I dismiss his stats on and fold the flop or assume him to be a LAG and call him more lightly? If the second, should my line be any different?

2. If you think my stats should be dismissed and I should fold the flop then let's assume his stats are correct ... how do you play this hand?

Thanks,
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-31-2007, 04:11 AM
SuperJez SuperJez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 207
Default Re: 88 v. LAG

I would just fold the flop. However if you call the turn then you should really call the river. I mean are you really calling for a 2 outer otherwise you are folding?? Like I say, I would probably just fold the flop anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-31-2007, 04:12 AM
Hoopster81 Hoopster81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: between the click of the light and the start of the dream
Posts: 3,648
Default Re: 88 v. LAG

not folding flop

possibly folding turn

probably playing it the same
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-31-2007, 04:17 AM
Bond18 Bond18 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blogging, you know where.
Posts: 5,444
Default Re: 88 v. LAG

Vs a big time LAG i'm probably playing it the same, but with your sample size i'm more inclined to fold flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-31-2007, 04:26 AM
lauren t lauren t is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 158
Default Re: 88 v. LAG

wow you guys are huge nits. no wonder i run over tables so easily nowadays. folding the flop ?? LOL

you played it fine.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-31-2007, 04:35 AM
bigbabyjesus bigbabyjesus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: was billyjex
Posts: 668
Default Re: 88 v. LAG

[ QUOTE ]
wow you guys are huge nits. no wonder i run over tables so easily nowadays. folding the flop ?? LOL

you played it fine.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. Folding this flop is super weak.

1) It misses him ALOT.

2) People generally will slowdown on this dry boards w/ a high card, putting you on top pair and realizing there are not scare cards to get you to fold.

The turn is a fold usually, although I sometimes call it and see a river.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-31-2007, 05:25 AM
lolgimmickaments lolgimmickaments is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21
Default Re: 88 v. LAG

[ QUOTE ]
I would just fold the flop. However if you call the turn then you should really call the river. I mean are you really calling for a 2 outer otherwise you are folding?? Like I say, I would probably just fold the flop anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

NOTY
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.