Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2006, 10:35 PM
LordTacohead LordTacohead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 874
Default $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t200 with t25 antes (4 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com

CO (t7988)
Button (t1252)
SB (t2385)
Hero (t1875)

Preflop: Hero is in BB with 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
<font color="gray">CO folds</font>, <font color="gray">Button folds</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to t2360 (All-in)</font>, Hero calls t1650 (All-in)

Hero is a 2+2er I was playing against a little while ago. He's been here a lot longer than me, so I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, but this call seems wack to me. According to SNGPT, it's unprofitable if SB is pushing 98% or less. Am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2006, 10:46 PM
EscapePlan9 EscapePlan9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,067
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

Perhaps he thought he had some read on you. Perhaps he was tilting or bored. Perhaps he unknowingly made a bad call. Who knows.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2006, 11:10 PM
blackize blackize is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,037
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

As you know, villain was me. I figured there would be a post about this later. Was multitabling and thought I was the short stack, blinds were due to go up shortly, and you had pushed on my BB the last 5+ orbits. In fact blinds went up to 200/400 the next hand.

I figured you were pushing ~100% here, and while that may have been a touch loose you did in this hand have 68s which represents ~65% of hands.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2006, 11:24 PM
bluefeet bluefeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Galapagos Islands of course
Posts: 5,032
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

I agree that a knowledgeable SB is pushing any two. I don't think that this is a horrible call at all - especially if you two play a bit together.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2006, 11:36 PM
yellowjack yellowjack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: fighting -EV
Posts: 2,152
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

Without referring to SnGPT, this call looks terrible to me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2006, 11:48 PM
LordTacohead LordTacohead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 874
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

What surprised me is that I hadn't been pushing on you that much. If you go back and check you'll see that I actually folded a couple of small blinds to you (which was a mistake; one of my leaks is that I don't pull the trigger every time I should). And even if I were pushing 32o, this would still only be slightly better than break-even. But I guess if you thought you were the small stack it's a different story. Grr. I was counting on you to play better! That'll teach me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2006, 11:52 PM
BvlyHls90210 BvlyHls90210 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 285
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

BB made a mistake? It is possible to make mistakes, I make several a day and it costs me dearly.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2006, 12:52 AM
Snarf Snarf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Men should act like Men
Posts: 4,488
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

[ QUOTE ]
Perhaps he thought he had some read on you. Perhaps he was tilting or bored. Perhaps he unknowingly made a bad call. Who knows.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is actually one of the better posts I've read on this board about stuff like this.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-15-2006, 01:20 AM
45suited 45suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 6 max NL
Posts: 2,432
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

[ QUOTE ]
PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t200 with t25 antes (4 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com

CO (t7988)
Button (t1252)
SB (t2385)
Hero (t1875)

Preflop: Hero is in BB with 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
<font color="gray">CO folds</font>, <font color="gray">Button folds</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to t2360 (All-in)</font>, Hero calls t1650 (All-in)

Hero is a 2+2er I was playing against a little while ago. He's been here a lot longer than me, so I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, but this call seems wack to me. According to SNGPT, it's unprofitable if SB is pushing 98% or less. Am I missing something?

[/ QUOTE ]

Keep in mind, if BB was not a 2+2er, you'd get called about 99% of the time here. Especially if you've been pushing alot. It's a $16 sng for God's sake. Do you really think that there are very many players at that level who will fold here? Take that into account when pushing random crap from the SB.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-15-2006, 01:37 AM
Knight Vision Knight Vision is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Stacking off with TPTK
Posts: 1,367
Default Re: $16: I don\'t quite understand this call

45S, my brotha. You been out of the loop too long me thinks. Granted Hero has only 7BBs left after posting, but most Heroes don't even think about it in terms of BBs, they look at their cards, look around the table, see that they are one player from ITM and fold more than they should.

Their range isn't all THAT loose.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.