Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2006, 06:33 PM
Conny Conny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Learning poker
Posts: 72
Default OESD - Tricky turn decision

I have no reads on any of the players at this table. This is the third hand for me at this table.

PokerStars 0.10/0.20 Hold'em (10 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is UTG+2 with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls, MP1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls, MP1 calls, CO calls.

Flop: (11 SB) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero checks, MP1 checks, CO checks.

Turn: (5.50 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, Hero?

I'm getting 4.3:1 on this call wich I consider quite marginal. A 9s or 9c, a As or Ac might not help. However, even if I cannot get the math right this is a call, right?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2006, 06:51 PM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

-You stand to make money on the river when you hit your straight
-You may win by pairing, particularly if it's a non-[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2006, 06:56 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wookie is right
Posts: 8,848
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

You can't call this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2006, 06:59 PM
Heron Heron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 89
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

I would not call this. Probably at least one of your opponents already has a straight. In that case you would be drawing for a tie.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2006, 07:09 PM
bravos1 bravos1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: looking for the bigger nits
Posts: 7,905
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

[ QUOTE ]
I would not call this. Probably at least one of your opponents already has a straight. In that case you would be drawing for a tie.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] HUH? If someone already has a straight, then there is no way for the hero to draw to a split pot if he hits his straight. Hero has the nut straight draw and no one can chop w/ hero if they already have a made hand.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2006, 07:43 PM
Goodnews Goodnews is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London Ontario
Posts: 1,017
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

This is not even close to a call. To call this you need to be sure that you will collect 4 bets on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2006, 09:32 PM
drzen drzen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Donkeytown
Posts: 2,704
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

[ QUOTE ]
This is not even close to a call. To call this you need to be sure that you will collect 4 bets on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why? I mean, I think it's a fold, but why four bets exactly?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-2006, 12:29 AM
Scary_Tiger Scary_Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,590
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

Folding this is awful.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-03-2006, 04:00 AM
DrMega DrMega is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 171
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

Seems to be a difference of opinion here among some experienced folks - I'd be interested to hear what we're putting sb and utg+1 on. I'd be inclined to think K and Q are worth at least partial outs, as well as the obvious nut outs.

OTOH, there are now two flush draws out there and several people to act behind, so even the nut outs are probably not full outs either? I would also be a little worried about those left to act, particularly if sb gets squirrely and re-raises.

I'm just thinking out loud here and definately in learning mode.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-03-2006, 04:06 AM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: trying to 363 u
Posts: 14,916
Default Re: OESD - Tricky turn decision

[ QUOTE ]
Folding this is awful.

[/ QUOTE ]
agree, and raise preflop.

the flop checked around so it's very possible utg1 has just a J or T. and the flopped flush draw usually bets so you can only worry about the turned flush draw. call. sucks if it goes for more bets but it's pretty damn unlikely given the action. SB can only 3bet if he slowplayed the flop.

edit: i missed that SB pfr'd and checked the flop, which is somewhat bad because he might actually have a 3betting hand. but then if he does have one of those you're likely to go a lot of bets on the river (also dont forget that other players behind you will make horrid calls to pump up the pot before we see teh river).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.