Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221  
Old 11-20-2007, 11:59 AM
sh58 sh58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: brighton
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

oh dear

please kill me.

these guys play so bad. jamie is such a luckbox. his line with KK was awful. if you are trapping with KK PF, why would you raise in the dark, it is just madness.

guys c/r was awful, golds call was even worse. golds bet on the turn there was awful as well, i was wondering whether he was turning his hand into a bluff, but obviously not as he checked behind on the river. so he was betting TP on the turn for value apparantly, lolololololol.

barry's river call was pretty bad too.

the standard in this game is dreadful, maybe now people will understand how jman wasn't being arrogant when he said it was such a soft game
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:06 PM
menacing_1 menacing_1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 121
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure Guy played his JJ badly. Against most players that would be a terrible line since, as already noted, it turns your hand into a bluff. However, against someone who bluffs a lot (Jamie) and who plays combo draws like pair plus gutshot strongly (Jamie) which is a hand you aren't that far ahead of, then a raise is the perfect play.
Think about how many cards you don't want to see on the river even if you think Jamie is full of it.

Maybe that isn't what he was thinking, maybe he is pretty bad and just thought "ZOMG, overpair! I can't lose!" but maybe he isn't as bad as we thought. It is hard to tell, he is getting hammered by the deck.

Tony

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I don't know which is more entertaining...the show, or reading the posts of the kids who think they are better than these players. Guy is getting lambasted for a check raise into a dangerous board, but Phil Galfond had the same opportunity with pocket queens on a dangerous board and mucked to Farha's bet on the turn, causing everyone to rip him apart for being weak. If you go back and look at the bashers, they're probably one and the same.
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:41 PM
Vavavoom Vavavoom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hottest Male Competitions
Posts: 4,778
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Either Guy is terrible or a [censored] genius. What a sick c/r against Jamie with JJ on 9765 board.

[/ QUOTE ]

guy is one of the biggest losers in poker

[/ QUOTE ]

But one of the biggest winners in life
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:45 PM
shipitkthx shipitkthx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 936
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I want to break Gold's nose real bad.

Terrible poker in this episode. I don't want to talk about the AA vs KK hand, I'm just going to pretend it never happened. Greenstein's J9 call was pretty atrocious, even against Sammy he just wasn't beating anything. Guy's checkraise was just bizarre and pretty terrible, although Gold managed to turn it into a good play by making an even worse call.

[/ QUOTE ]

why was barry's call atrocious? it's farha. i bet sammy's 3 barreled barry there with much less before.

[/ QUOTE ]

I understand that its sammy, bla bla bla, but on that board what can sammy have?? Every straight draw (including gutshots) but 1 now have him beat. There is no chance that Farha is value betting worse. I just don't see what hand Barry can beat on that board. What range of hands do u think sammy is 3 barreling there to make Barry's call anything but bad?
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:45 PM
thrasher789 thrasher789 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 327
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

[ QUOTE ]




[/ QUOTE ]

sooooo good, especially Farha's and Esfandiari's quotes
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:46 PM
Brad1970 Brad1970 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Posts: 1,815
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Either Guy is terrible or a [censored] genius. What a sick c/r against Jamie with JJ on 9765 board.

[/ QUOTE ]

guy is one of the biggest losers in poker

[/ QUOTE ]

But one of the biggest winners in life

[/ QUOTE ]

He's one of the couple at this table who can afford these stakes & not be hurt if he loses. Doyle even said as much in one of his interviews.
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:58 PM
samp15555 samp15555 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

[ QUOTE ]
Jamie Gold is a good nice player and hes good for the game. If anyone can afford to get stacked, why not Guy? Hehe looking forward to it tonite.

[/ QUOTE ]
becasue guy is a nice person and is donating his money jamie gold is the wrost player i have every seen in my life and he should have got stacked like 4 times.
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:59 PM
Noir_Desir Noir_Desir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hilbert Space
Posts: 355
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

[ QUOTE ]

Jamie: Let's just check, check.
Sammy: But I know I have the best hand.
Jamie: EXACTLY, SO YOU SHOULD CHECK!!!!!1!


[/ QUOTE ]
That's perfectly in line with Jamie's view on good river play.
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 11-20-2007, 12:59 PM
Mr_Moore Mr_Moore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 452
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

Some people here have claimed that sammy really did not bet that river because he wanted to be kind towards gold.
Why would sammy be nice towards Gold?
They both spew out so much bs during this hand
Why was sammy mad at gold after the QQ 107 hand?
also, I disagree with most of you, watching gold is amusing.
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 11-20-2007, 01:05 PM
Noir_Desir Noir_Desir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hilbert Space
Posts: 355
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/19 - 500K buyin pt 3 - Spoilers on al

I think he wanted to be kind to Gold because he envisages action worth more than 180k with him. If Gold seriously takes up PLO that could result in a massacre.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.