#1
|
|||
|
|||
Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
I’m looking for stats that someone might have (50,000+ hand samples for a level) comparing their success on Full Tilt to any other site (Pokerroom if possible) in BB/100 hands. In addition to the stats I’m looking for some general observations to go along with them as I realize the numbers won’t mean everything. I’ve just signed up at Full Tilt and I’m curious as to how it compares in level of play to other sites. I play NL400 so the closer you play to this levels, the more useful the information will be for me. Any info is appreciated.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
Full Tilt is 9 handed while PokerRoom is 10 handed.
Full Tilt has a bet pot button which causes more people to play correctly inadvertantly. PokerRoom has alot of bad weak tights (at least when I used to play there when it was open to US customers). Full Tilt has alot of bad TAGs. Just adjust your play accordingly. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
My database says ... NL 10, 40.000 hands, -11.42BB/100
with 2167 winners and 3456(lol at this number) loosers (me beeing one of them -.-) Dont think this will help you much but meh ... at least I tried'it |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
I was under the impression that the rake at pokerroom was higher which may have a bearing as well.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
It is higher for limit, and it is actually lower for no limit.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
I've had 40K+ hands at both sites and found PR a little juicier. Since PR closed to US residents, I've played FT and Stars and, for reasons I dont yet appreciate, have had much better results at Stars NL 25 and 50.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
Full Tilt rake is pretty atrocious, but the play is awful there.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
Funny that you bring this up:
FT NL50 49K hands -2.93 BB/100 PS NL50 54K hands +1.56 BB/100 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
at NL400 the games tend to be overly tight, so play accordingly. There's only like half a dozen regulars you really need to be wary of.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt vs. other sites (BB/100)
[ QUOTE ]
I’m looking for stats that someone might have (50,000+ hand samples for a level) comparing their success on Full Tilt to any other site (Pokerroom if possible) in BB/100 hands. In addition to the stats I’m looking for some general observations to go along with them as I realize the numbers won’t mean everything. I’ve just signed up at Full Tilt and I’m curious if I will still be a luckbox on the site. I play NL400 so the closer you play to this levels, the more useful the information will be for me. Any info is appreciated. [/ QUOTE ] FYP |
|
|