*Official STTF SnG Book Review Thread*

[IlliniDave]

Agree with Slim here on being able to show the full quantitative assessment of hand decisions. Maybe some standard small table showing numbers/results for each decision. I'm a novice at using SNGW right now so trying to work my way through the hand examples myself to get some experience.

[cidcamp]

I´ve been wondering what kind of criteria do you use to separate low, mid and high blind play? 30/60 with t1500 starting stacks would be considered mid blind?

[Ramjet]

Does this book only concentrate on online SnG's or is it also useful for home / casino games?

[DevinLake]

I believe it is mostly contentrating on a 50/30/20 pay out structure. Online, live...doesn't matter.

[AMT]

[ QUOTE ]
I´ve been wondering what kind of criteria do you use to separate low, mid and high blind play? 30/60 with t1500 starting stacks would be considered mid blind?

[/ QUOTE ]


given the effective stacks, yeah i would think so.

[cidcamp]

so it would be like a green,yellow and red zone?An M criteria would be accurate?

[raptor517]

why the [censored] didnt i write a book 3 years ago when no1 knew how to play?

[AMT]

[ QUOTE ]
why the [censored] didnt i write a book 3 years ago when no1 knew how to play?

[/ QUOTE ]


mystery remains unsolved. Citanul was closest I believe.

[DevinLake]

[ QUOTE ]
why the [censored] didnt i write a book 3 years ago when no1 knew how to play?

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you really like to go back, give up a year of your poker development and have written a book? I'd say you did good things with that year.

[Jaswarbrick]

Could anyone recommend this book to me? I am currently playing the $1.20 sngs at Pokerstars hoping to move up to higher limits when i have the bankroll. Will this book be good enough to serve this purpose? Thanks.