Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Stud
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2007, 11:03 PM
PARASOFT PARASOFT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 17
Default Razz: Is this an easy check/fold?

Player 1: (x, x) A, 3, K
Player 2: (2, 5) 7, 9, T
Is this an easy check/fold?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2007, 11:51 PM
Alchemist Alchemist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^ I\'m a party dog!
Posts: 1,133
Default Re: Razz: Is this an easy check/fold?

[ QUOTE ]
Player 1: (x, x) A, 3, K
Player 2: (2, 5) 7, 9, T
Is this an easy check/fold?

[/ QUOTE ]

What was the action on 3rd and 4th? Dead cards? Position?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2007, 11:52 PM
Andy B Andy B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blowing 0.0%
Posts: 9,170
Default Re: Razz: Is this an easy check/fold?

More information would be good, but probably.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2007, 11:59 PM
PARASOFT PARASOFT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 17
Default Re: Razz: Is this an easy check/fold?

This is a question from Sklanskly's book, and there wasnt more infomormation there neither...
I think, we can assume there was nothing extraordinary, so table was 6-8 handed, at 3rd it was completed and player 1 bet at 4th and player2 called. And at 5th, player2 checked and player1 bet. Assume player 1 is a reasonable player, and started with 3 card 8 or better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2007, 12:09 PM
SGspecial SGspecial is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Doctor Razz
Posts: 1,209
Default Re: Razz: Is this an easy check/fold?

[ QUOTE ]
This is a question from Sklanskly's book, and there wasnt more infomormation there neither...
I think, we can assume there was nothing extraordinary, so table was 6-8 handed, at 3rd it was completed and player 1 bet at 4th and player2 called. And at 5th, player2 checked and player1 bet. Assume player 1 is a reasonable player, and started with 3 card 8 or better.

[/ QUOTE ]
SOR asks the reader to assume a lot of things, and it also always assumes your opponents are reasonable, thinking, and well versed in the game. Just remember what assumptions tend to do...

p.s. This is actually a very similar hand to one shown on the WSOP HORSE telecast last night where Fossilman was player 1 and Gabe Kaplan was player 2 (tho I believe Greg caught the paint card on 4th instead of 5th). Fossilman actually paired his "good" catch but went on to win the hand with a bluff on the river. Kaplan butchered the hand about as badly as humanly possible.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-20-2007, 12:15 AM
Andy B Andy B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blowing 0.0%
Posts: 9,170
Default Re: Razz: Is this an easy check/fold?

If player 1 has a four-card Seven, he's almost a 2:1 favorite. If he has a four-card Eight, he's still a nice favorite. If he's paired, obviously player 2 is a big favorite. I think on balance this is a fold for player 2 in a smallish pot such as you describe. He's looking at a 3 BB commitment. The only point at which he would be able to confidently bet his hand is sixth street, if it comes good to him and bad to the other guy, and this will only happen a smallish percentage of the time. And if player 1 is lucky enough to make a 75 on the river, just how much action does he want to put in?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2007, 09:12 AM
Zagga Zagga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 844
Default Re: Razz: Is this an easy check/fold?

Our T low is beating his K low atm, I would definatly call and hope he bricks on the 6th.

Then again, it depends alot on the previous action, the pot etc etc
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2007, 10:36 AM
RustyBrooks RustyBrooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,380
Default Re: Razz: Is this an easy check/fold?

[ QUOTE ]
Our T low is beating his K low atm, I would definatly call and hope he bricks on the 6th.


[/ QUOTE ]

A lot of people play this way, and it's tempting to do so, but the problem here is:
* We only improve, and he doesn't, a portion of the time - this is often enough to call if we would win every time we improved
* But villian will redraw a portion of the time we outdraw him, and since our redraw is not great, it's somewhat unlikely that we'll improve again and still beat him.
* We'll be forced to call down all the way if villain does not improve 6th, villain can easily fold 7th if he bricks 6th.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.